The 2.5-kg wieght is released from rest -- Determine the spring constant k

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a 2.5-kg weight released from rest, requiring the determination of the spring constant k. Participants clarify the use of gravitational potential energy in the context of the problem, emphasizing that the potential energy is calculated based on the height differences at positions A and B. The concept of mechanical energy conservation is highlighted, indicating that the absolute value of potential energy is less important than the differences between positions. There is also a query about the appropriate forum for posting questions related to the textbook "Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students," with suggestions for categorization. Overall, the method for solving the problem is confirmed to be correct, pending numerical calculations.
Alexanddros81
Messages
177
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


14.27 The 2.5-kg weight is released from rest in position A, where the two springs
of stiffness k each are undeformed. Determine the largest k for which the weight
would reach position B

Fig P14_27.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Pytels_Dynamics115.jpg


Hi. Can you check if I am going at the right direction?
Also for ##Wy_B## and ##Wy_A## am I replacing with 2.5(0.45) and 2.5(0.3) respectively?
 

Attachments

  • Fig P14_27.jpg
    Fig P14_27.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 971
  • Pytels_Dynamics115.jpg
    Pytels_Dynamics115.jpg
    16.3 KB · Views: 552
Physics news on Phys.org
So far so good except for the gravitational potential energy.
 
Do I replace ##Wy_A## and ##Wy_B## with 2.5(0.3) and 2.5(0.45) respectively?
 
Alexanddros81 said:
Do I replace ##Wy_A## and ##Wy_B## with 2.5(0.3) and 2.5(0.45) respectively?
Almost but not quite. Something is missing. The problem talks about a 2.5-kg weight. Is weight measured in kilograms?
 
A yes but ofcourse W = mg where mass is m=2.5kg.
But I don't understant why the Potential Energy of W is mg(0.3) at position A and mg(0.45) at position B.
I mean I don't understant it in relation to the Figure.
Can you explain to me a bit more?
At Which point do I say that the potential energy of W is zero? (in the figure)
 
Last edited:
Alexanddros81 said:
At Which point do I say that the potential energy of W is zero? (in the figure)
Any point you like. The zero of potential energy is irrelevant. Consider this, when a mass moves from point A to B, mechanical energy conservation says
TA + UA = TB + UB
or
TB - TA + UB - UA = 0
or
ΔT + ΔU = 0.
It's the difference that matters, not where you put the zero of energy because it drops out.
 
By the way do I post problem questions from
'Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students' by Curtis
in this forum (Introductory Physics Homework)?
 
Last edited:
Alexanddros81 said:
By the way do I post problem questions form Orbital Mechanics for Engineers by Curtis
in this forum (Introductory Physics Homework)?
I am not familiar with the textbook. I looked at its table of contents and I think "Advanced Physics Homework" would be more appropriate. Try that and if I am wrong, a mentor will move it to its rightful place, perhaps in "Engineering."
 
Ok so here is my solution:

Pytels_Dynamics118.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Pytels_Dynamics118.jpg
    Pytels_Dynamics118.jpg
    17.1 KB · Views: 496
  • #10
I didn't run the numbers, but the method is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes Alexanddros81
Back
Top