# The asymptotic lower bound for sorting n elements is n*log(n)

• flufypancakes
In summary, sorting a set of n elements that only take on k distinct values has a lower bound of n*log(k). This can be achieved by mapping the values to integers and using an array to count the occurrences of each value, resulting in a cost of n for inspecting each value, an unknown cost for mapping, and a cost of k for outputting the sorted list.
flufypancakes
the asymptotic lower bound for sorting n elements is n*log(n). what about sorting a set of n elements when you know that they only take on k distinct values? does n*log(k) sound right?

Suppose that we could map each of the k values to the integers 1 to k. Also, suppose that we have k values in an array all set to 0. Then a sort would only look once at each number in a list. For each number the value is mapped to an index and the associated array element is incremented. Then the sort is completed by reporting as many values of each type as there are counts in each array element.

cost of inspecting each value n
+ cost of mapping each value from 1 to k ??
+ cost of outputting the sorted list k

Yes, n*log(k) does sound right for sorting a set of n elements when you know they only take on k distinct values. This is because the lower bound for sorting is dependent on the number of comparisons needed to sort the elements. In the case of a set with only k distinct values, the number of comparisons needed will be reduced as there are fewer unique values to sort. Therefore, the lower bound will be n*log(k) instead of n*log(n). This is known as the "distinctness constraint" and is a common factor in lower bounds for sorting algorithms.

## What is an asymptotic lower bound?

An asymptotic lower bound is a theoretical limit on the performance of an algorithm as the input size approaches infinity. It represents the best possible time or space complexity for solving a particular problem.

## Why is the lower bound important in sorting algorithms?

The lower bound helps us understand the minimum amount of time or space required to sort a given number of elements. It serves as a benchmark for evaluating the efficiency of different sorting algorithms.

## What does n*log(n) represent in the lower bound for sorting algorithms?

n*log(n) is the time complexity of the best sorting algorithms, such as merge sort and quicksort. This means that as the number of elements (n) increases, the time taken to sort them will increase at a rate proportional to n*log(n).

## Is n*log(n) the only possible lower bound for sorting algorithms?

No, there are other lower bounds for sorting algorithms, but n*log(n) is the most commonly used and is considered optimal. Some sorting algorithms may have a lower time complexity for specific types of input, but they will have a higher complexity for other types of input.

## How does the asymptotic lower bound impact the practical implementation of sorting algorithms?

The lower bound helps us choose the most efficient sorting algorithm for a given problem. It also guides the development of more efficient algorithms to improve the overall performance of sorting in real-world applications.

• Programming and Computer Science
Replies
29
Views
2K
• Programming and Computer Science
Replies
13
Views
2K
• Programming and Computer Science
Replies
12
Views
1K
• Programming and Computer Science
Replies
1
Views
1K
• Programming and Computer Science
Replies
12
Views
2K
• Programming and Computer Science
Replies
75
Views
4K
• Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
17
Views
1K
• Programming and Computer Science
Replies
1
Views
1K
• Programming and Computer Science
Replies
15
Views
2K
• Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
0
Views
1K