The Bicycle's Upright Mystery: Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter ishansaksena
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mystery
AI Thread Summary
A bicycle remains upright primarily through the steering mechanism that corrects any lean, rather than relying on gyroscopic forces, which have been shown to be less significant than previously thought. The concept of "trail" plays a crucial role, as it creates a torque that steers the front wheel into the direction of the lean, helping to return the bicycle to an upright position. Some specialized bicycles achieve stability without trail by using a mass positioned above and in front of the front tire, which also induces corrective steering. The discussion highlights that while gyroscopic effects can influence steering, they are not the primary reason for maintaining balance. Overall, slight turns are essential for a bicycle to stay upright while traveling in a straight line.
ishansaksena
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

Why does a Bicycle stay upright ?
(It's not because of the gyroscopic forces applied by the wheels as shown by http://ruina.tam.cornell.edu/resear...ics/stablebicycle/StableBicyclev34Revised.pdf)

In short this bicycle has wheels of the same size rotating in the opposite direction thus countering the gyroscopic force but it still manages to stay upright.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is more than one way this can be accomplished, but what the methods have in common is to steer the front wheel into the direction of lean sufficiently to correct the lean and return the bicycle back to vertical orientation (although the direction of the bike will have changed).

For a normal bicycle, this is done with "trail", the point of contact with the ground is behind the point where the pivot (steering) axis of the front wheel intercepts the ground. This results an inwards steering torque due to the upwards force from the pavement being applied "behind" the extended pivot axis.

Some research type bicycles don't use any "trail", and instead use a mass mounted above and in front of the front tire, so that the center of mass is in front of the pivot axis and above the rotational axis, which again results in the front tire steering into the direction of lean, but I don't know the details involved with this type of design.
 
I'm sorry if I wasn't clear, I already have a similar understanding of how it turns, my question is how it tends to stay upright when it's traveling in a straight line ( all the other sites say it's because of the gyroscopic effect which has now been proven wrong by http://ruina.tam.cornell.edu/resear...ics/stablebicycle/StableBicyclev34Revised.pdf )

Thanks,
 
ishansaksena said:
I already have a similar understanding of how it turns, my question is how it tends to stay upright when it's traveling in a straight line
To stay upright it makes slight turns.

ishansaksena said:
( all the other sites say it's because of the gyroscopic effect which has now been proven wrong )
Note that the gyroscopic effect is not supposed to keep the bike itself upright. Is just steers the wheel into the direction the bike falls over, so the bike straightens up again. The trail effect does the same. This wasn't proven wrong for normal bikes. It was just shown that the same steering effect can be achieved by other means, without trail and without gyroscopic effect.

Check out this thread where Andy Ruina, one of the authors, commented himself:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3851566
 
Last edited:
Thanks, that video was really helpful.
:approve:
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top