The Blushing Face of Saturn: Radiance, Luminosity & Habitable Zone

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of determining Saturn's luminosity and its implications for calculating the habitable zone around gas giants. The user expresses frustration over the complexity of finding relevant data, particularly regarding Saturn's radiant output, which is reportedly 2.5 times what it receives from the sun. They mention that Saturn radiates approximately 37.5 W/m^2 and ponder whether this radiant product can be equated to luminosity for habitable zone calculations. The user seeks clarity on this relationship, acknowledging the difficulty of the calculations involved. Overall, the conversation highlights the intricacies of astrophysical measurements and their relevance to habitability assessments.
writtenword
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Okay, reeling from a defeat in the stellar ring with a self gravitating mass of gas that imploded at a massive temperature when all I wanted it to do was hang around nice and calmly while I put gravitating bodies in it...now I move on to a slightly more conventional model. I do plan to do most of this work myself but I am having a hard time finding the luminosity for various *cough* gas giants *cough*

You know, after a high school career of endless numbers, mindless numbers, numbers that stood for other numbers and finally a more refined and urbane set of numbers in college that still insisted on being truck loads of related figures surrounding everything mathematical and cosmological, I try to find the luminosity of Saturn and OOOohhh no it's not that simple son. No, no we need to talk to you a while about it. Let's talk about internal process resulting in heat and the break down of helium. Where are all my numbers now when I need them? Traitors, I say! ...ahem...anyway.

For instance Sol has a luminosity of 3.846×10^26 W

I read that Saturn radiates 2.5 times what it receives from the sun

I read that the sun radiates to Saturn about 16.7 – 13.4 W/m^2

Lets call it 15 W/m^2

So it (Saturn) radiates 37.5 W/m^2

I read that the habitable zone of a given star is roughly the square root of its luminosity. Now I understand that this equation is the sort of desperate calculation that one might expect to find hanging out in grimy alleys after a stiff rain , its clothes dark with sweat and accumulated math. But I am going to put it forth anyway. Assume all other factors skew in favor of any mass in that zone. And at any rate, I just want to have an idea of where that zone might be given the output of a gas giant. Saturn here is my unwilling co-conspirator in this fantastical ruse so don't hold anything against it.

Is the radiant product of Saturn the same as its luminosity for purposes of calculating a habitable zone?

That's my question. My thanks in advance.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org


If you ask your question more clearly, you might get more responses.
 


Thank you for taking an interest Vanadium 50,

Is the radiant product of Saturn the same as its luminosity for purposes of calculating a habitable zone?

If anyone can think of a clearer way to ask that without resorting to Jack, Jane and Spot, do let me know. In the mean time that’s my question. Perhaps it is very much more difficult that I had imagined it would be. I certainly can’t seem to find anything beyond that vaguest sentiment that this moon or that moon might be habitable in some sense.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top