The Book *The Mathematics of Relativity for the Rest of Us*

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the book *The Mathematics of Relativity for the Rest of Us*, which aims to make complex mathematical concepts accessible to those with limited mathematical backgrounds. A participant expresses concern about potential errors in the text, specifically mentioning an erroneous statement in the second paragraph on page 5. The participant seeks feedback on the book's overall accuracy and its suitability for individuals with minimal math experience, emphasizing a preference for applied learning over abstract equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of high school mathematics concepts
  • Familiarity with physics fundamentals
  • Interest in applied mathematics
  • Willingness to engage with mathematical texts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research common mathematical errors in popular science books
  • Explore resources on applied mathematics in physics
  • Investigate supplementary materials for *The Mathematics of Relativity for the Rest of Us*
  • Learn about effective study techniques for mathematical concepts
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for individuals interested in understanding the mathematics behind physics, particularly those with limited mathematical backgrounds, such as high school graduates or adult learners seeking to re-engage with math in a practical context.

aCogCorroded
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi. I am someone who would like to begin to understand the mathematics behind physics. I have forgotten much of the math that I was taught in high-school, not that I paid much attention at the time, unfortunately. I ran across the book The Mathematics of Relativity for the Rest of Us which looks great, but scrolling down, I found that apparently the second paragraph on page 5 contains erroneous information. I was wondering if anyone here has read the book, and whether or not this is just a mistake or is the text full of errors? Also, what you may have thought of the text for someone that is basically a sixth-grader when it comes to math, and I am afraid I am not exaggerating by too much.

I would prefer to learn the math in an applied manner, as solving a bunch of equations with no visible real world applications is one of the reasons I didn't pay much attention in high school. Not that the payoff isn't worth it; I'm just afraid I will not be able to stay motivated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry I posted this in the wrong area. Guess I missed the book forum.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K