DjLeo
- 1
- 0
My question is, Why do we use q=1.6*10^-19 C rather than -1.6*10^-19 C, for the charge on an electron in most of the equations?
The discussion revolves around the convention of representing the charge of an electron as q = 1.6 x 10^-19 C instead of -1.6 x 10^-19 C. It touches on historical context and the arbitrary nature of charge designation.
Participants appear to agree on the arbitrary nature of charge designation, but there is no consensus on the preferred representation of the electron's charge in equations.
The discussion highlights the historical context of charge designation and the lack of a definitive reason for the choice of sign in the representation of the electron's charge.