The collector is a high impedance when compared to the emitter.

AI Thread Summary
The statement "the collector is a high impedance when compared to the emitter" refers to the operational characteristics of an NPN transistor in common mode as an amplifier. In this context, the collector circuit is reverse biased, resulting in higher resistance, while the emitter is forward biased, leading to lower resistance. Practically, this means that in an emitter follower configuration, the output impedance is very low, around 5 ohms or less, allowing for stable output voltage under varying loads. Conversely, in a common emitter amplifier, the output impedance is significantly higher, typically between 1000 to 10000 ohms, which is influenced by the collector resistor. Understanding these impedance differences is crucial for effective transistor amplifier design and application.
davidhills
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Good Morning

can anyone help explain what this statement really means, when referring to a npn transistor in common mode, as an amplifier.

"The collector is a high impedance when compared to the emitter"

what's the pratical implication of this statement

thanks

David
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
it means that collelctor ckt is reverse biased (during active state of transistor)...so it is having higer resistance in this situation.

emitter is forward biased (during active situation).so it is having lower resistance...
 
In an emitter follower, the output impedance is very low. It can be around 5 ohms or less.
This means that you can put a load of this impedance on it and the output voltage will drop to half.
In practice, this means that the output voltage of an emitter follower is almost the same regardless of normal load variations.

In a common emitter amplifier, the output impedance is almost equal to the size of the collector resistor and this may be something like 1000 ohms to 10000 ohms. So it is a lot larger than the emitter output impedance.
It is actually equal to the collector resistor in parallel with the output impedance of the transistor.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top