The Conservation Laws - Particle Physics

12x4
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Question:
Screen Shot 2015-05-07 at 12.32.15.png

Figure 1:
Screen Shot 2015-05-07 at 12.31.53.png


QUESTION ABOVE.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution

:[/B]

P + P → K+ + K- + P + P

Firstly, I just wanted to check that this is correct. I found the answer pretty quickly by googling it but have since spent a long while trying to understand it. I was hoping that someone might be able to affirm what I have learned as I have read so much that I feel like I'm getting everything a bit confused now.

As far as I'm aware everything in this collision is conserved apart from the isospin. Is this okay to do? and does this mean that I can now assume that this is an Electromagnetic Interaction?

Secondly, Figure 1. gives the table we will be given in our upcoming exam.

I was wondering what a few of the table headings are supposed to denote.

In the quark table:
I assume J = spin
I3 = Isospin
then what does I mean?

and then again in the Hadron table:
J = spin?
I = Isospin?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where do you see a change of isospin and how would that be relevant?
The reaction is possible via the electromagnetic interaction, but the electromagnetic interaction is weak. There is another interaction that will dominate that reaction.

Isospin is I, the parameter I3 is its component in "z"-direction.
 
mfb said:
Where do you see a change of isospin and how would that be relevant?
The reaction is possible via the electromagnetic interaction, but the electromagnetic interaction is weak. There is another interaction that will dominate that reaction.

Isospin is I, the parameter I3 is its component in "z"-direction.

Thanks for your reply mfb,

Think this is where i was getting confused.

If the collision is: P + P → K+ + K- + P + P

Then the conservation laws for the isospin aren't conserved?

Following the order of the collision above the isospin would be: 1/2 + 1/2 → 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2, 1 ≠ 2 (according to the table above)

And I believe I read somewhere that if the isospin isn't conserved then it is a electromagnetic interaction.
 
Forgot to say, I now see that kaon pair production must be a product of the strong force. Just trying to understand how and when I need to worry about the isospin. Or can there be two types of interaction happening simultaneously?
 
You cannot add isospin like that. "I" is the magnitude of a vector, those don't add linearly.
12x4 said:
And I believe I read somewhere that if the isospin isn't conserved then it is a electromagnetic interaction.
That does not make sense.
12x4 said:
Just trying to understand how and when I need to worry about the isospin.
Not at all, if you take care of the number of up- and down-quarks in the same way you do it for the other types.
12x4 said:
Or can there be two types of interaction happening simultaneously?
It is possible to have more than one interaction type in the same process, yes.
 
Thank you mfb, think I am there now.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top