The cross product and dot product of vectors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculations of the cross product and dot product of vectors A and B. The user initially struggles with determining the angle theta and calculating the dot product with vector C, leading to confusion over their results. They attempt to use matrix methods for the cross product but end up with incorrect values due to improper distribution and vector notation. Clarifications are provided regarding the correct approach to the cross product and the importance of vector component order, ultimately emphasizing that kAxB is equivalent to k(AxB). The user expresses gratitude for the assistance received in resolving their homework problems.
Xiience
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/2527/physicsin9.jpg

i've been working with the AxB in the first one, and found that |A||B|sin(theta) = A x B, and i thought i had found my theta to be 1 degree, but i don't believe that's right. also, when i attempted to do the dot product with the C vector, i got completely lost..these are the last 2 problems on my homework, and any advice towards completely them would be so, so greatly appreciated

Thank you so much
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
For \vec{A}=a_1 i+a_2j+a_3k and \vec{B}=b_1i+b_2j+b_3k


\vec{A}\times \vec{B} = \left|<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> i &amp; j &amp; k\\<br /> a_1 &amp; a_2 &amp; a_3\\<br /> b_1 &amp; b_2 &amp; b_3<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right|
 
okay, so using that cross product, I've got (-7.00)[C(7, -8, 0) . (-36, 72, -48)]
(7.00)(-828)
=-5796

does that look right? i believe i did the dot product right, a1b1+a2b2+a3b3

hm, that definitely does not look right.
 
What was your vector for 6 \vec{A} \times \vec{B} ?
 
(-48, 168, -54)

i think i did it wrong :( i distributed through (2i, 3j, -4k) x (-3i, 4j, 2k)

what i think my textbook said was i x j = k , ect.

i've managed to pull something up on matrices, like the way you showed it. going to try to work it out that way now
 
Last edited:
i got -9156 as my answer, and it is wrong =\

using matrices
( i j k) ( 3 4) ( 2 -4) (2 3 )
(2 3 4) ( 4 2) i - ( -3 2) j + (-3 4) k
(-3 4 2)
that led my 6(A x B) to be (132, 48, 8), then i did a1a2 + b1b2 + c1c2 with my C vector and my A x B vector, then i multiplied what i got from that by -7, and it got me -9156, and it is wrong :(

edit- those matrices look horribly sloppy, but you get the idea
 
Xiience said:
i think i did it wrong :( i distributed through (2i, 3j, -4k) x (-3i, 4j, 2k)

what i think my textbook said was i x j = k , ect.

This method is fine; but the way you wrote your vectors is incorrect: A=2i+3j-4k or (2,3,-4) but not (2i, 3j, -4k).

And you did end up calculating the product incorrectly.

When you distribute the cross product you need to be mindful of the order in which you write the cross products; i x jj x i...You should get:

A x B=(2i+3j-4k) x (-3i+4j+2k)= -6(i x i)+8(i x j)+4(i x k)-9(j x i)+12(j x j)+6(j x k)+12(k x i)-16(k x j)-8(k x k)=22i+8j+17k

And so 6A x B=132i+48j+102k.

that led my 6(A x B) to be (132, 48, 8), then i did a1a2 + b1b2 + c1c2 with my C vector and my A x B vector, then i multiplied what i got from that by -7, and it got me -9156, and it is wrong :(

Well, the last component of your 6A x B was incorrect, but that shouldn't have impacted your final answer since C has no z-component.

Still, you have somehow incorrectly calculated the dot product; 7*132-8*48=924-384=540 which does not give you -9156 when you multiply it by -7.
 
Xiience said:
i got -9156 as my answer, and it is wrong =\

using matrices
( i j k) ( 3 4) ( 2 -4) (2 3 )
(2 3 4) ( 4 2) i - ( -3 2) j + (-3 4) k
(-3 4 2)
that led my 6(A x B) to be (132, 48, 8), then i did a1a2 + b1b2 + c1c2 with my C vector and my A x B vector, then i multiplied what i got from that by -7, and it got me -9156, and it is wrong :(

edit- those matrices look horribly sloppy, but you get the idea



Find 6A and then cross that vector with B

kAxB is not the same as k(AxB)
 
i figured out the first one, and the second one my roommate got and explained it to me, he did it a really weird way, idk

thank you for all your help though!
 
  • #10
rock.freak667 said:
kAxB is not the same as k(AxB)

Yes it is.
 
Back
Top