The dereference between; astrophysics, astronomy, cosmology and space science

AI Thread Summary
Astrophysics, astronomy, cosmology, and space science are interconnected fields with overlapping definitions. Cosmology focuses on the universe as a whole, while astrophysics often involves numerical computations related to celestial phenomena, and astronomy tends to emphasize observational studies of objects like nebulae and interstellar media. Space science generally pertains to planetary science, examining the geology and atmospheres of celestial bodies. The distinctions between these fields can vary, with some classifications based on practical applications, such as NASA's separation of heliophysics from astrophysics. Understanding these nuances is essential for selecting appropriate university courses in these disciplines.
wolfspirit
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
hi
i am looking at uni courses and i a a bit confused between the differences between; astrophysics, astronomy, cosmology and space science in terms of what is covered in each . Can anyone help please.
Ryan
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Cosmology is the study of the universe as a whole, this term is unambiguous.

As for the others, there isn't really any universal definition. Astrophysics and astronomy are almost synonymous, with astrophysics more often being used for work involving numerical computations of things like neutron stars or stellar winds, and astronomy perhaps dealing more with nebulae, dust clouds, interstellar media, and things like this. But again the terms don't really have a clear definition. I hear space sciences used more often do describe things like planetary science, such as studying the geology of Mars or Venus, or perhaps the atmosphere of Jupiter or an exoplanet.
 
In some circles, astrophysics is theoretical whereas astronomy is observational.

Planetary science has more similarities with geology than with say stellar astronomy.

The other thing is that the distinctions sometimes appear for curious reasons. For example, in most university departments, there isn't a separate field of "heliophysics" because the sun is just another star. However, when NASA sets up their committees, they have a "heliophysics division" which is separate from the "astrophysics division". The reason is that from the physics point of view the sun is "just another star" but from the "can we build a spaceship to visit the place and take ultra close pictures" point of view, it's very different.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top