The Deutsch problem in quantum computation

ptabor
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a research paper on the deutsch problem in QC. My google inquiries have turned up numerous papers on solutions to the problem, but I am having difficulty finding a clear formulation of the problem itself.

Can someone point me in the direction of this information?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://www.cs.xu.edu/~kinne/quantum/deutche.html

In short,
You have a function f: {0,1} --> {0,1} (there are four possible functions like this). You want to know the answer to the question - is f(0)=f(1)?. A classical circuit (and hence, any classical algorithm) must evaluate f twice: you must evaluate f(0), and also f(1); and then you compare them. With Deutsch's algorithm, if you have a quantum computer you can exploit superposition to answer the question with only one evaluation of f.
 
To clarify what is on that page:

The Hadamard operator H operates on a single qubit, and its matrix representation is

\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left( \begin{array}1 &amp; 1 \\ 1 &amp; -1<br /> \end{array} \right)

The unitary operator corresponding to f (operates on two qubits) is:

f(x,y)=(x,y+f(x)) for eigenstates x,y, and extended to arbitrary x,y by linearity.

(i.e., f(a0+b1, c0+d1) = acf(0,0)+adf(0,1)+...)
 
The function can take input over x = 0,1,2,..2^n-1 for any integer n.

The key is that you are promised that the function is either constant, or it is balanced. "Constant" means that either f(x)=1 or f(x)=0 for every input x, "balanced" means that f(x)=1 for exactly half of the possible inputs and f(x)=0 for the other half of the inputs.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top