The diffence between expanding universe and light slowing?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the perceived expansion of the universe and the potential slowing of light over time. Participants explore whether changes in the permittivity or permeability of space could create an illusion of expansion and consider the implications of a decreasing speed of light on cosmic observations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a decrease in the speed of light could create the illusion of an expanding universe, questioning whether this could be tested.
  • Others argue that if the speed of light were decreasing, it would also affect the structure of atoms and molecules, which appear consistent across the observable universe.
  • One participant suggests that a lowered speed of light would not account for observed redshifting and that changes in permittivity would likely lead to blue shifting instead.
  • Another point raised is that space is too transparent to contain a medium that would allow for changes in the speed of light due to permittivity variations.
  • Some participants note that the fine structure constant is closely tied to the speed of light and that its constancy over billions of years suggests that the speed of light has remained stable throughout much of cosmic history.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the implications of a changing speed of light and its effects on cosmic observations. There is no consensus on the validity of the proposed ideas or their implications for the understanding of the universe's expansion.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of measuring changes in the speed of light and the potential interdependencies with fundamental constants and atomic structure. The discussion highlights the challenges in testing these hypotheses and the limitations of current observational data.

Edward Solomo
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
I am under the impression that the slowing of light over time would make the universe appear to be expanding. Is it possible that the permittivity or permeability of space has been decreasing over time giving the illusion of an expanding universe?

Is there any way to test the differences and rule out the slowing of light. In fact, if we were to assume that the speed of light was decreasing (in a vacuum), would it even be possible to detect a decreasing speed of light, given our instruments, metrics and clocks would all slow down proportionally?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Edward Solomo said:
I am under the impression that the slowing of light over time would make the universe appear to be expanding. Is it possible that the permittivity or permeability of space has been decreasing over time giving the illusion of an expanding universe?

Is there any way to test the differences and rule out the slowing of light. In fact, if we were to assume that the speed of light was decreasing (in a vacuum), would it even be possible to detect a decreasing speed of light, given our instruments, metrics and clocks would all slow down proportionally?
The difficulty here is that the speed of light is intimately related to the relative strength of the electric and magnetic forces which hold matter together. So if you change the speed of light, you also change the structure of atoms and molecules. The structure of atoms appears to be nearly identical across the entire observable universe. There may be some tiny changes for really far-away galaxies, but those are so far using rather error-prone measurements that have yet to be independently confirmed. And regardless, the changes in the structure of atoms are so tiny that they wouldn't result in any noticeable change in the speed of light.
 
I think he means that the specific light traveling to us through deep space is being slowed, creating an impression of expansion, rather than suggesting the maximum speed of light in general has decreased since the big bang.

I'm only making a guess, but I don't think light with a lowered top-speed would, by itself, account for the observed red shifting. Also, a decrease in the permittivity of space would most likely require an increase in its density, leading to the opposite effect of expansion which would blue shift the light.
 
salvestrom said:
I think he means that the specific light traveling to us through deep space is being slowed, creating an impression of expansion, rather than suggesting the maximum speed of light in general has decreased since the big bang.

I'm only making a guess, but I don't think light with a lowered top-speed would, by itself, account for the observed red shifting. Also, a decrease in the permittivity of space would most likely require an increase in its density, leading to the opposite effect of expansion which would blue shift the light.
There's also the point that space is far, far too transparent to be filled with any sort of medium that would allow any sort of change in the speed of light due to a change in permittivity.
 
I thought Light red-shifted because of a change in frequency as it passes through expanding space, not that photons slow down.
 
Correct shifty, OP is just saying what if...
 
The speed of light is intimately tied to the alpha [fine structure] constant, as noted by Chalnoth. The alpha constant is vital to stellar fusion and even a modest change could disrupt synthesis of elements like carbon, or even prohibit stellar fusion in the first place. We also know from spectral lines of quasars that alpha has not changed to any noticeable extent for about 10 billion years. So we have good reason to believe c has been fairly constant throughout most of the history of the universe.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K