The Divergence of a Regularized Point Charge Electric Field

1missing
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
1. Problem: Consider vector field A##\left( \vec r \right) = \frac {\vec n} {(r^2+a^2)}## representing the electric field of a point charge, however, regularized by adding a in the denominator. Here ##\vec n = \frac {\vec r} r##. Calculate the divergence of this vector field. Show that in the limit a -> 0 the divergence becomes proportional to the δ-function.

Homework Equations


∇⋅ = ## \frac \partial {\partial x} + \frac \partial {\partial y} + \frac \partial {\partial z}##

The Attempt at a Solution


So it seemed pretty straight forward to me, but I feel like there's something fundamental that I'm not seeing.

##\vec r = \left( x, y, z\right)##

##r = \sqrt {x^2 + y^2 + z^2}##

∇⋅A## \left( \vec r \right) = {\frac \partial {\partial x}} \frac x {\left( x^2 + y^2 + z^2\right)^{1/2} \left( x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + a^2 \right)} + {\frac \partial {\partial y}} \frac y {\left( x^2 + y^2 + z^2\right)^{1/2} \left( x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + a^2 \right)} + {\frac \partial {\partial z}} \frac z {\left( x^2 + y^2 + z^2\right)^{1/2} \left( x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + a^2 \right)} ##

I don't have any trouble with the computation, rather I feel like I didn't set this up correctly. Can anyone confirm if I'm moving in the right direction? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you wrote is completely correct. At first sight, calculating this looks like a lot of work, but once you realize how symmetrical the expression you wrote down is, you can easily conclude that it suffices to calculate one of the three derivatives.
 
Awesome, guess I'll start plodding away. And I guess just to make sure, for the second part, all I would need to do is set a = 0, integrate over all space, and confirm it equals 1?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top