Archived The drift and diffusion currents under equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
In equilibrium, a pn junction has no external connections, resulting in a net current of zero, yet both drift and diffusion currents can exist simultaneously. Drift current arises from the movement of charge carriers due to an electric field, while diffusion current occurs from the concentration gradient of electrons and holes. The discussion clarifies that although the total current is zero, the individual currents are not necessarily zero, as they balance each other out. The confusion about charge accumulation and the continuity of current is addressed by noting that drift prevents equal concentration of carriers, maintaining ongoing diffusion. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for grasping the behavior of pn junctions in semiconductor physics.
anhnha
Messages
179
Reaction score
1
Can you help me explain this part from my book?
attachment.php?attachmentid=59370&stc=1&d=1370675472.jpg

attachment.php?attachmentid=59367&stc=1&d=1370673591.jpg


In equilibrium, the pn junction has no external connections, i.e., the terminals are open and no voltage is applied across the device.
If so, I wonder why there is drift current in the equation above. In equilibrium, the total current is zero but I don't understand how can they get the equation.
Is it right that in equilibrium, the total current is zero but each current (drift and diff currents) are not necessary to be zero?

PS: I have just seen the image. It is relatively clear now. In equilibrium, the net current is zero.
From that I can get the equation above. However, I am confused about these currents. I think they are only exist in a short of time, right?
After that time:
The diffusion is zero when the concentration of electrons and holes are equal in P and N sandwiches.
The dift currents are zero when all minority charge carriers are depleted.
If possible, can you explain about the next part?
 

Attachments

  • Drift and diff current.JPG
    Drift and diff current.JPG
    44.2 KB · Views: 924
  • PN junction currents.JPG
    PN junction currents.JPG
    16.2 KB · Views: 2,112
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
@anhnha... I see you are still active now. Can you explain to me what the next part in the following sentence is?

anhnha said:
If possible, can you explain about the next part?
 
Thank you!
Could you explain about unrealistic phenomenon here?
Why is there a charge accumulation?
I don't see how is each side of equation 2.61 can be zero.
For the right hand side part, the total current always flows from p to n and in the left hand side the total current always flows from p to n.
I don't see how possible it is to assume that each side of the equation is zero.

With the next part, I meant to say that because there is a limited number of electrons on each side of the pn junction so after the diffusion all electrons and holes are spread equally so how is it possible for the current to continue here?
I think I can answer it now. Because of the drift current, the concentration will never be equal so there is always diffusion current.
 
OK. The problem with my understanding of this phenomenon is that it does not contain all these terms. Can I know how old you are? Because I have just learned this topic myself (I am 17), and I could help you understand it the way I understood it, because my way makes a little more sense physically. But that is only if you want me to.

PS: I hope you are not female. Last time I checked, asking females their age was not chivalrous. :smile::oldbiggrin:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top