The Earth's magnetic field is essentially that of a magnetic dipole....

AI Thread Summary
The Earth's magnetic field behaves like a magnetic dipole, with a strength of approximately 10^-4 T near the North Pole. To calculate the magnetic field at 13,000 km above the surface, the relevant equations involve the magnetic dipole moment and the distances from the dipole. The variables "R" and "x" in the equations represent the radius of the dipole and the distance from the dipole, respectively, with the assumption that x is much greater than R for simplification. Clarification on the orthogonality of R and x is necessary, as it impacts the interpretation of the equations. Understanding the dipole's location is crucial for accurately determining the value of x in this context.
hitemup
Messages
81
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



The Earth's magnetic field is essentially that of a magnetic dipole. If the field near the North Pole is about 10^-4 T, what will it be (approximately) 13,000 km above the surface at the North Pole?

Homework Equations



B = \frac{\mu _0}{2\pi}\frac{\mu}{(R^2+x^2)^{3/2}}

for x >> R

B = \frac{\mu _0}{2\pi}\frac{\mu}{x^3}

The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to find the magnetic field of a dipole on its axis for a circle. My textbook uses the second formula to solve this problem. But I cannot understand what "x" and "R" are for the earth, and how we assumed x>>R.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wherever you got that equation from (link?), it should state what the variables mean and what constraints there are on its validity. If you can't provide a link, please quote them.
The form of it (##R^2+x^2##), suggests R and x are orthogonal, which doesn't sound right for the given question.
 
haruspex said:
Wherever you got that equation from (link?), it should state what the variables mean and what constraints there are on its validity. If you can't provide a link, please quote them.
The form of it (##R^2+x^2##), suggests R and x are orthogonal, which doesn't sound right for the given question.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/curloo.html#c3

This is the same formula except pi*r^2*I is changed with mu(magnetic dipole moment) in mine.
 
"Dipole field" is the name for the field from a current loop in the limit ##R\rightarrow 0##, with m or ##{\bf \mu} = \pi R^2 \;I## constant. So Haru is right and your book is right too.

That eliminates the R question. Now you should think about where this dipole could possibly be located, and therefore what to take for the x.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top