The Earth's shape is a result of its spin, but why is it not a perfect sphere?

  • Thread starter Thread starter semc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth
AI Thread Summary
The Earth is not a perfect sphere due to its rotation, which causes it to take on an oblate spheroid shape, flattened at the poles and bulging at the equator. This shape results from the balance between centrifugal forces from the Earth's spin and gravitational pull. Galileo's observations of Venus' phases supported the heliocentric model proposed by Copernicus, demonstrating that planets, including Earth, revolve around the Sun. Without rotation, gravity alone would create a perfect sphere, but the Earth's spin alters this balance. The discussion highlights the interplay between gravitational forces and rotational dynamics in determining the Earth's shape.
semc
Messages
364
Reaction score
5
okay i know everyone knows Earth is not a sphere but why is that so?has it got to do with the spin?
btw,i was wondering how did galileo found out that sun is not in Earth orbit but the other way round in the past?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Copernicus (before galileo) found that the retrograde motions of planets are easily explained if all planets, including earth, revolved areound the Sun. Galileo made observations of Venus that showed phases just like the Moon has. Simple analysis proved that these phases can only be due to revolution around the Sun, and not the Earth.
 
If we disregard the surface irregularities of the Earth that solid matter makes, the Earth is an oblate spheroid (a flattened sphere).
This shape is the natural one for an object revolving around its own axis.
Close to equator, the centrifugal effect works more strongly than close to the poles, thus when the centrifugal effects are balanced by the pull of gravity, the flattened shape is what you'll get.

With gravity alone and no revolution about any axis, you'd get a perfect sphere.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top