The effect of a magnetic field on the growth rate of crystals

AI Thread Summary
Research on crystal growth rates indicates that magnetic fields can influence the process, though the specific mechanisms and substances involved require further exploration. For foundational knowledge, recommended reading materials should cover crystallography and the effects of magnetic fields on materials. Regarding electromagnets, using a wire looped around an iron nail connected to a battery is not efficient due to overheating and weak magnetic strength. Instead, opting for strong permanent magnets, such as neodymium magnets, is advisable for lab applications, as they provide better performance without the drawbacks of homemade electromagnets.
warsame.farah
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello I am currently researching on crystals and how their growth rate is affected by magnetic fields for my upcoming lab. Most of the information is based on labs but I quite don't understand what they speak of. So I was wondering if anyone here has any nice reading material on crystals and magnets so I can familiarize myself with the terminology and concepts. I also was wondering if electromagnets made of an iron nail looped with a wire and connected to a battery is an efficient magnet for the lab i am preparing to do. I read that it does overheat a lot and the magnets were not that strong. So i was wondering if anyone can also point me to a magnet I can create or buy that is cheap but efficient for use for in my lab. I'll appreciate your help.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
What makes you think crystal growth rates would be affected by magnetic fields? Which substance(s) are you thinking about?

And no, a wire looped around a nail connected to a battery makes for a demonstration of how an electromagnet works, but it's not a good electromagnet. Compared to that, you might as well get a strong permanent magnet. (e.g google for neodymium magnets)
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top