The Effect of Planets Rotation within its Galaxy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether a planet's gravitational force increases due to its rotation around the center of its galaxy. While kinetic energy does contribute to gravitational effects, the overall gravitational pull of a planet or star remains unchanged regardless of its orbital speed around the galaxy. The gravitational force experienced by orbiting planets is primarily influenced by their mass and distance from the central star, rather than their velocity. Additionally, the relative velocities of objects in different orbits do not create a significant difference in gravitational force. Ultimately, the gravitational characteristics of celestial bodies are consistent, regardless of their motion through space.
erickdt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

A curious person here would like to know if a planet gains gravitational force as it rotates around the center of its galaxy. From what I understand this speed is quite impressive (the speed at which we travel around the center of our galaxy) so I'm wondering if the sheer mass of our planet (or sun), traveling at that velocity, would have the effect of amplifying Earth's (or the suns) gravitational force.

Thanks in advance for any explanation!

E
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
I'm guessing you are thinking that energy is mass so a high kinetic energy would result in a higher "mass" which means extra gravity compared to if it is still.

I think the short answer is "yes and no".
The generator of the gravitational field is the stress-energy-momentum tensor ##T^{\mu\nu}## whose components are energy ##T^{00}##, co-momentum ##T^{0,j}## and co-stress ##T^{ij}##.

Anything with a non-zero Tμν will feel gravity. In the non-relativistic limit co-momentum and co-stress vanish and energy reduces to mc2, which explains why masses appear in a non-relativistic description of gravity.

Kinetic energy contributes to gravity, mainly in the energy and co-momentum parts.

A quick calculation should show you how fast the Sun would have to be going to give it additional energy similar enough to it's mass-energy, and so show up as additional gravity that you'd notice. Even so - the Earth moves with the Sun, so the Sun is not going all that fast wrt us... and it is relative speeds that count here.

You also seem to be asking if overall gravity increases due to motion - I think the best answer here is "no", after a circuit of the galaxy, the Solar system has the same gravity that it started with.

Introduction to general relativity.
http://preposterousuniverse.com/grnotes/grtinypdf.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello Simon,

Thanks for your response! It looks as though I have some more reading to do!

I guess what I'm wondering is whether or not the gravitational pull or stars on their respective orbiting planets is in some part due to the velocity at which they orbit the center of our galaxy.

Our sun for example orbits the center of the Milky way at about 139 MPS. Pretty darn fast! Let's say it wasn't orbiting anything at all, just standing "still" in space. Would its gravitational pull be less than it currently is moving at its impressive speed?

Along these same lines, would an object that rotates around the center of the Milky Way have less gravitational force than the same object rotating around the outer extents of the Milky Way (assuming their moving at the same RPM)? The object that is further out from the center would be going faster since it would have to be covering more space to maintain the same RPMs as the inner object.

Thanks again for your help! I really appreciate it!

E
 
I guess what I'm wondering is whether or not the gravitational pull or stars on their respective orbiting planets is in some part due to the velocity at which they orbit the center of our galaxy.
No. But it is in some small part due to their velocity with respect to their planets.

would an object that rotates around the center of the Milky Way have less gravitational force than the same object rotating around the outer extents of the Milky Way (assuming their moving at the same RPM)? The object that is further out from the center would be going faster since it would have to be covering more space to maintain the same RPMs as the inner object.
The short answer is "no".
The gravitational force in question is the same both ways - the relative velocity contributes a component.
There is no absolute frame for velocity, so at each instant, the outer object is the fast one in the frame of the inner object and the inner object is the fast one in the frame of the outer one.

There are complications due to the large distances and the fact that rotating frames are non-inertial.
We are also dangerously close to mixing up the models too much.

BTW: properly, something that goes around another is said to be circling or orbiting - not rotating.
The term "rotating" is reserved for objects that turn about their own axis. So the Earth rotates (on it's axis) as it orbits the Sun: two different motions.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top