The Effective Lagrangian of the Electromagnetic Field

r.sahebi
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
hi to everyone

L=T-V
as you know it is the lagrangian equation
the effective Lagrangian of the electromagnetic field is given by following relation in gaussian units.
L=(1/8pi) (E^2-B^2)
how is must calculate this relation?

(the energy density of electromagnetic fields is given by u=(1/8pi) (E^2+B^2) )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know why you'd call that 'effective', that is the normal lagrangian density of the e-m field (without gauge fixing, of course).
 
dextercioby said:
I don't know why you'd call that 'effective', that is the normal lagrangian density of the e-m field (without gauge fixing, of course).

yes, that's my wrong
can you tell me how i can have it?
 
This comes out from a careful analysis of the unitary representations of the Poincare group. This Lagrangian is the only one for a free massless vector field (written in its representation as a four-vector field) with only discrete intrinsic (helicity) degrees of freedom and admitting space-inversion symmetry (parity invariance). This can only be realized in terms of an Abelian gauge theory. For details, see

http://fias.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/lect.pdf

(Appendix B).
 
vanhees71 said:
This comes out from a careful analysis of the unitary representations of the Poincare group. This Lagrangian is the only one for a free massless vector field (written in its representation as a four-vector field) with only discrete intrinsic (helicity) degrees of freedom and admitting space-inversion symmetry (parity invariance). This can only be realized in terms of an Abelian gauge theory. For details, see

http://fias.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/lect.pdf

(Appendix B).

thanks a lot.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top