The Effective Lagrangian of the Electromagnetic Field

r.sahebi
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
hi to everyone

L=T-V
as you know it is the lagrangian equation
the effective Lagrangian of the electromagnetic field is given by following relation in gaussian units.
L=(1/8pi) (E^2-B^2)
how is must calculate this relation?

(the energy density of electromagnetic fields is given by u=(1/8pi) (E^2+B^2) )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know why you'd call that 'effective', that is the normal lagrangian density of the e-m field (without gauge fixing, of course).
 
dextercioby said:
I don't know why you'd call that 'effective', that is the normal lagrangian density of the e-m field (without gauge fixing, of course).

yes, that's my wrong
can you tell me how i can have it?
 
This comes out from a careful analysis of the unitary representations of the Poincare group. This Lagrangian is the only one for a free massless vector field (written in its representation as a four-vector field) with only discrete intrinsic (helicity) degrees of freedom and admitting space-inversion symmetry (parity invariance). This can only be realized in terms of an Abelian gauge theory. For details, see

http://fias.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/lect.pdf

(Appendix B).
 
vanhees71 said:
This comes out from a careful analysis of the unitary representations of the Poincare group. This Lagrangian is the only one for a free massless vector field (written in its representation as a four-vector field) with only discrete intrinsic (helicity) degrees of freedom and admitting space-inversion symmetry (parity invariance). This can only be realized in terms of an Abelian gauge theory. For details, see

http://fias.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/lect.pdf

(Appendix B).

thanks a lot.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top