The electric field between two adjacent uniformly charged hemispheres

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the electric field between two adjacent uniformly charged hemispheres, one conductive and one non-conductive. Participants express confusion about the behavior of the electric field in the gap and the concept of uniform charge density in conductive materials, noting that charges typically reside on the surface, leaving the interior neutral. The conversation also touches on the symmetry of the hemispheres, clarifying that there is no significant difference between the two orientations. The need for a clearer problem statement is highlighted, as the initial context is deemed insufficient for analysis. Overall, the thread seeks to explore the implications of these physical principles in the given scenario.
greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Schermata 2020-11-29 alle 12.35.33.png here is the situation

Hi guys,

I should illustrate the motion of an electron in both cases, but I cannot really understand how will the field be like in the gap between the two(filled) hemispheres(conductor and non).

Another thing is: for the conductive hemispheres, does it make any sense to speak of "uniform charge density"(as mentioned in the statement of the problem)? Since these are conductors, won't all the charge arrange itself on the surface, creating a neutral charge on the inside?

[Moderator's note: Moved from a technical forum and thus no template.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there a problem statement (other than 'here is the situation) ?
And is there a diffence between up and down (other than from gravity?) ?
 
BvU said:
Is there a problem statement (other than 'here is the situation) ?
Unfortunately not... that's an idea for an insight I got by talking to a professor, which presented me with this task.
I would like to come up with something, even by "interpreting" the situation to make it reasonable.

BvU said:
And is there a diffence between up and down (other than from gravity?) ?
What do you mean?
 
I meant 'difference' , sorry.
Explanation: physicists always look for symmetries.
 
BvU said:
I meant 'difference' , sorry.
Explanation: physicists always look for symmetries.
Okay, in that case, no;
up and down hemispheres are the same
 
Then there is no preference for either up or down...
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top