The Energy of Radiation from a Carbon-Oxygen Double Bond

  • Thread starter Thread starter I'm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the wavelength and energy of radiation absorbed by a carbon-oxygen double bond with a frequency of 6.0 x 10^13 s^-1. The wavelength is correctly identified as 5.0 x 10^-6 m. For energy calculations, the user attempted to use the equation E = hv but expressed uncertainty in deriving the energy per mole of photons. Clarification on units is emphasized, noting that "M" should refer to meters instead of molar concentration. Accurate calculations and unit representation are crucial for understanding the energy of radiation in this context.
I'm
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A carbon-Oxegen double bond in certain organic molecules absorbs radiation that has a frequency of 6.0 x 10^13 s^-1

A. What is the wavelength of this radiation?
B. What is the energy of this radiation per photon? per mole of photons?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



for A I got

5.0 x 10 ^-6 M

for B I just don't know how to do it

I tried using E = hv, and I got 3.9 x 10 ^-20
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please.
 
Show units in your answers, 3.9x10-20 means nothing.

M is a molar concentration, I suppose you meant m for meters. If so, you are right in A.

--
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

What Is the Maximum Wavelength to Break the Weakest Bond in AsClF42-?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Chemistry Valence Bond Theory: Energy of a system with H and Cl atoms
Replies
6
Views
3K
Bond Dissociation Energy Problem
Replies
2
Views
6K
Chemistry Understanding Bonding Energy in Water for Electrolysis Calculations
Replies
4
Views
3K
Organic chemistry hybridization and bond angles
Replies
1
Views
4K
Exercise about determining energy of light that breaks bonds
Replies
3
Views
4K
How Many Carbon-Carbon Double Bonds in C11H19COOH?
Replies
7
Views
4K
What Mass of Oxygen Gas Is Liberated from Heating Sodium Nitrate?
Replies
2
Views
3K
How Does 1,3-Butadiene Absorb UV Light in Terms of Particle-in-a-Box Theory?
Replies
3
Views
3K
Calculate the "surface energy" of succesively smaller cubes
Replies
3
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top