How Does 1,3-Butadiene Absorb UV Light in Terms of Particle-in-a-Box Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter terp.asessed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons Pi
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
Sign up Log in
3 replies · 4K views
terp.asessed
Messages
126
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


The UV/visible spectroscopy of linear conjugated molecules, particularly 1,3-butadiene in this problem, can often be modeled with the Particle-in-a-box of the electrons. Assume that we are interested in the pi electrons ONLY. A molecule with N double bonds = 2N pi electrons.

(1) To obtain the ground state, put 2N electrons in the LOWEST possible energy levels. Assume the box is of length L, what is the energy of the highest energy electron, as function of L and N?

(2) When 1,3-butadiene absorbs photon energy (hv), it uses the energy to promote 1 electron to a higher level. What is the lowest energy light the molecule can absorb, again, as a function of L and N?

Homework Equations


C-C bond length = 1.54 Angstrom
C=C length = 1.35 Angstrom
The angle between the bonds = 120 degree

L(in Angstrom) = (2.50)N - 1.32

The Attempt at a Solution


For butadiene, it has 2 double bonds...so N = 2 and 2(2) = 4 pi electrons, where 2 pi electrons compose energy level n=1 and second couple at n=2, with the possibility of one electron jumping to n=3 level with energy...

L = 2.50(2) - 1.32 = 3.68 Angstrom

...Could someone hint me as how to progress from here? I am stuck. Also, I know from the Schrödinger Equation that En = n2h2/(8mL2), from H wavefunction(x) = E wavefunction (x), where V(x) = 0 b/c of confinement inside a box...so, I wonder if I should use this equation too?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Discussion

terp.asessed said:
I wonder if I should use this equation too?

That would be my approach - it is just a matter of finding appropriate values of n (you already did part of the job earlier).

Disclaimer: QM is not something I feel confident about (but this particular problem looks rather straghtforward).
 
Okay...but, I am stuck as what the problem requests...especially as a function of N and L...Still, thank you.
 
Not sure what your problem is - looks to me like you have correctly listed all the necessary information in your attempts at solving the problem.