The energy released for white dwarf collapsing into neutron star

kdlsw
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
The question is attached.
I'm not sure how to approach to part (b).
The energy released could be in 3 forms, the rest mass energy for those matter ejected during supernova explosion, the binding energy released as the atomic structure changed, the ejected matter carries off some kinetic energy.

I assume the question is only asking for the binding energy (as it mentioned "photons" in part (e))?
Quantum density, the degenerated pressure from electrons and neutrons are mentioned during lecture, but I'm not sure if these are necessary for this question

Please share some ideas with me, or maybe some solutions. Thank you
 

Attachments

  • 2012Q9.PNG
    2012Q9.PNG
    29.7 KB · Views: 602
Physics news on Phys.org
Does the collapse of a white dwarf to a neutron star generally result in a supernova?
Notice that part (c) asks to compare with the energy released from a supernova ... should be a clue.

What are you told changes in the collapse?
What kind of energy do you normally associate with this change?

You'll need to check your notes about "quantum density" to see if you need to consider it explicitly.
 
Hint: Use the virial theorem (2T + V = 0). How much does the total energy change, compared to the potential energy? What happens to the change in energy?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top