The force of gravity of two objects on a third?

AI Thread Summary
When three masses m1, m2, and m3 are positioned such that m2 is greater than m1 and m3 is placed at the midpoint between them, m3 will be attracted towards m2 due to its larger mass. The discussion highlights the confusion about the increasing net force on m3 and the implications of nudging it towards either m1 or m2. It is clarified that if m3 is at a balance point where the forces from m1 and m2 are equal, any small movement will lead to an unstable equilibrium, causing m3 to fall towards one of the larger masses. This dynamic illustrates the gravitational interactions and stability of the system. Overall, m3's behavior is dictated by the gravitational pull from m1 and m2, with the larger mass exerting a stronger influence.
Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


[/B]
Imagine we have three masses, m1, m2 and m3. m2 is greater than m1. m3 is smaller than both. If we hold m1 and m2 in place without movement, and place m3 in the midpoint of the line adjoining m1 and m2, what will happen to m3?

Homework Equations


Newton's law of gravitation

The Attempt at a Solution


Since m2 > m1, I would think that the net force would be towards m2. However, this doesn't seem to make sense because the net force would just get greater and greater and eventually collide with m2. But this doesn't seem to be right. What would happen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mr Davis 97 said:
Since m2 > m1, I would think that the net force would be towards m2. However, this doesn't seem to make sense because the net force would just get greater and greater and eventually collide with m2. But this doesn't seem to be right. What would happen?
I'm not sure why this result bothers you. Sounds quite reasonable to me that m3 will be drawn towards the larger mass.

Can you give a bit more detail to your statement " the net force would just get greater and greater and eventually collide with m2"? What happens to make the net force increase? What is colliding (it sounds like you have the force colliding..)?
 
gneill said:
I'm not sure why this result bothers you. Sounds quite reasonable to me that m3 will be drawn towards the larger mass.

Can you give a bit more detail to your statement " the net force would just get greater and greater and eventually collide with m2"? What happens to make the net force increase? What is colliding (it sounds like you have the force colliding..)?
I guess it is reasonable, but what if I placed m3 right at the point on the line where the force m1 exerts on it is equal to the force m3 exerts on it. If I nudged m3 a little in tehe direction of m1, would it then collide with m1? And if I nudged it a little in the direction of m2, would it then collide with m2?
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
I guess it is reasonable, but what if I placed m3 right at the point on the line where the force m1 exerts on it is equal to the force m3 exerts on it. If I nudged m3 a little in tehe direction of m1, would it then collide with m1? And if I nudged it a little in the direction of m2, would it then collide with m2?
Sure. The balance point represents what is known as an unstable equilibrium: Any small perturbation will cause the mass to "fall" one way or the other.
 
  • Like
Likes Mr Davis 97
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top