The force, which attracts e to nucleus

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter valjok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Nucleus
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the forces acting on electrons in relation to the nucleus, specifically examining the Coulomb force and alternative models such as the spring-like interaction suggested by radio wave theory. Participants explore the implications of these models on electron behavior and the nature of atomic interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the nucleus attracts the electron via the Coulomb force, which weakens with distance (F = k / r²).
  • Others propose that electrons behave as if connected to the nucleus by a spring, allowing for harmonic oscillations influenced by radio waves (F = -kx).
  • A participant questions the implications of the spring model, suggesting it allows electrons to cross the atom's diameter, which contradicts the notion of infinite attraction at the center.
  • Another participant argues that the spring model is an approximation and that quantum mechanics resolves the contradiction regarding infinite attraction.
  • Some participants challenge the application of radio wave theory to electron-nucleus interactions, suggesting it misapplies concepts relevant to conduction electrons in metals.
  • There are claims that the electron can pass through the nucleus, with references to phenomena like electron capture decay.
  • Concerns are raised about the speed of electrons relative to the electromagnetic field, suggesting that the movement is more about the orbital than the electron crossing through the nucleus.
  • Participants note that the nucleus should not be treated as a mathematical point, implying a more complex interaction than simple models suggest.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the nature of forces acting on electrons and the validity of different models. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the applicability of the spring model or the implications of quantum mechanics.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on classical models versus quantum mechanical interpretations, as well as unresolved assumptions about the nature of atomic interactions and the behavior of electrons in various scenarios.

valjok
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Everybody knows that the nucleus attracts the electron by the Coulomb discovered electric attraction force: F = k / r2, which means the further is the electron from the nucleus r, the weaker is the attraction force.

On the other hand, those familiar with the classic radio wave theory know that the electrons interact with their nucleus as if they would be connected by a spring. The spring attracts the bob stronger the greater is the displacement x: F = -kx. This kind of force allows the radio waves to force harmonic oscillations of electrons.

If the radio wave model is right, the electron can cross the atom along its diameter likewise an object via the Earth over a tunnel -- it will experience to gravity in the center of the Earth. This contradicts to the first view, which tells that the attraction must be infinite in the center. Am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
valjok said:
1) Everybody knows that the nucleus attracts the electron by the Coulomb discovered electric attraction force: F = k / r2, which means the further is the electron from the nucleus r, the weaker is the attraction force.

2) On the other hand, those familiar with the classic radio wave theory know that the electrons interact with their nucleus as if they would be connected by a spring. The spring attracts the bob stronger the greater is the displacement x: F = -kx. This kind of force allows the radio waves to force harmonic oscillations of electrons.

3) If the radio wave model is right, the electron can cross the atom along its diameter likewise an object via the Earth over a tunnel -- it will experience to gravity in the center of the Earth. This contradicts to the first view, which tells that the attraction must be infinite in the center. Am I missing something?

1) is correct 2) is an approximation and so ultimately false. The k s differ btw. The electron will form the bob for quantum mechanical reasons around the center of the 1/r potential. This pretty much takes care of the infinity. If you displace the bob a little, you can do the F=-kx approximation. If you would displace the bob by a lot you would feel the 1/r potential.

3) The contradiction is resolved in quantum mechanics.
 
valjok said:
Everybody knows that the nucleus attracts the electron by the Coulomb discovered electric attraction force: F = k / r2, which means the further is the electron from the nucleus r, the weaker is the attraction force.

On the other hand, those familiar with the classic radio wave theory know that the electrons interact with their nucleus as if they would be connected by a spring. The spring attracts the bob stronger the greater is the displacement x: F = -kx. This kind of force allows the radio waves to force harmonic oscillations of electrons.

If the radio wave model is right, the electron can cross the atom along its diameter likewise an object via the Earth over a tunnel -- it will experience to gravity in the center of the Earth. This contradicts to the first view, which tells that the attraction must be infinite in the center. Am I missing something?

I will have to guess that "classic radio wave theory" is something like what happens with an antenna. If that is the case, you are misapplying the concept to the wrong thing. The interaction of EM wave with electrons in an antenna is not an interaction of electrons with a nucleus. Those electrons in an antenna are electrons in a metal and thus, are governed by the properties of conduction electrons in a metal. This has nothing to do with electrons tied to nucleus and is a completely different scenario.

Here's a hint next time you are faced with this kind of a puzzle - figure out which scenario provides the best match to the experimental observation. In this case, the coulombic interaction have given so many valid matches with experiments, whereas the harmonic potential hasn't, at least, not for the case of atoms.

Zz.
 
I is an extremely close approximation...which can be corrected when there is relative motion between the particles...
 
valjok said:
Everybody knows that the nucleus attracts the electron by the Coulomb discovered electric attraction force: F = k / r2, which means the further is the electron from the nucleus r, the weaker is the attraction force.

On the other hand, those familiar with the classic radio wave theory know that the electrons interact with their nucleus as if they would be connected by a spring. The spring attracts the bob stronger the greater is the displacement x: F = -kx. This kind of force allows the radio waves to force harmonic oscillations of electrons.

If the radio wave model is right, the electron can cross the atom along its diameter likewise an object via the Earth over a tunnel -- it will experience to gravity in the center of the Earth. This contradicts to the first view, which tells that the attraction must be infinite in the center. Am I missing something?

Good question, it sure seems to suggest the electron can cross the atom along its diameter right through the center. This certainly does suggest the force should become infinite.

In an atomic orbital model I think people are suggesting you can drop an electron into an orbital (up to 2 in the first hydrogen orbital). Once inside the orbital, the electron is nolonger influenced by the atom, but is still subject to outside forces and in fact may be pulled right out of that orbital by some great attraction, or get knocked out of the orbital by another moving electron or a passing photon.

In your radio wave example, perhaps one could visualize the electron going from side to side of whatever orbital its stuck in at the time.
 
edguy99 said:
Good question, it sure seems to suggest the electron can cross the atom along its diameter right through the center. This certainly does suggest the force should become infinite.
The electron does pass through the nucleus, and in the electron capture decay it even gets caught there.

edguy99 said:
[...]
In your radio wave example, perhaps one could visualize the electron going from side to side of whatever orbital its stuck in at the time.

No that is incorrect. The field is too slow and the electron too fast. It really is a movement of the orbital.
 
Last edited:
edguy99 said:
Good question, it sure seems to suggest the electron can cross the atom along its diameter right through the center. This certainly does suggest the force should become infinite.

The nucleus is not really a mathematical point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K