B What causes eddy currents to form in metals?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Aya Elsayed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core
AI Thread Summary
Eddy currents are induced in metals when exposed to a changing magnetic field, leading to internal heating. In the case of a galvanometer's metallic core, it does not experience eddy currents despite moving in a magnetic field. This is because the core typically remains in a steady magnetic field rather than a changing one. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the conditions under which eddy currents are generated. Thus, the lack of eddy currents in the galvanometer's core can be attributed to the stability of the magnetic field it operates within.
Aya Elsayed
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
There aren't any eddy currents in the metallic core of the galvanometer , Although it moves in a magnetic field? If it's right , why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aya Elsayed said:
There aren't any eddy currents in the metallic core of the galvanometer , Although it moves in a magnetic field? If it's right , why?
Welcome to the PF. :smile:

What reading have you done about eddy currents? What are the Relevant Equations?
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to the PF. :smile:

What reading have you done about eddy currents? What are the Relevant Equations?
Thanks! ... Eddy currents are induced in a metal when it feels a changing magnetic field . Then its internal temperature gets high and startes to melt . we apply that to the induction furnace... That's all what I knew about them .
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...

Similar threads

Back
Top