The gauge fields in Yang Mills theory are

Lapidus
Messages
344
Reaction score
12
The gauge fields in Yang Mills theory are matrices:

A_{\mu} = A^{a}_{\mu} T^{a}


But A^{a}_{\mu} are vector fields, i.e. a=1,..,n four-vectors. Should not there be a U(1) gauge symmetry for each of them in addition to the non-abelian gauge symmetry?

In Lagrangian for the strong force, does not each of these four vectors correspond to a gluon? Gluons or weak bosons are spin-1 particles, so they most be described by four vectors. How do they follow from matrices??

And how can a vector field/ a four-vector be non-abelian??

help, please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


In 4-dimensions each 4-vector corresponds to a spin-one particle(not 4 spin one particles).
In SU(N) there are N^2-1 generators so a,b goes from 1 to N^2 -1(not N). In SU(3) that makes 3^2 -1 = 8 gluons A^a_\mu
 


Lapidus, as you say, the gauge fields Aaμ in Yang-Mills theory are a set of four-vectors, a=1,..,n. The Ta are not fields and not matrices, they are the group generators. They will be represented by matrices if you consider their action on particles making up a particular group representation. Aaμ and Ta occur together in the covariant derivative, Dμ = ∂μ + ig AaμTa.

For example for QCD there are 8 gauge fields and 8 generators, a=1,..,8. Quarks belong to a 3-d representation labeled by color, i=1,2,3, and in the term of the Lagrangian where Dμ acts on them, the Ta will be represented by eight 3x3 matrices. Elsewhere in the Lagrangian, Dμ acts on the eight gauge fields themselves, and in that term the Ta will be represented by eight 8x8 matrices.
 


Each generator of the group does lead to a U(1) gauge symmetry, but since the generators have non-trivial commutation relations, these U(1)s are all linked together to form part of a larger group.

Think of the case of rotations in 3-space. There are three basis elements that together generate SO(3). But each generator alone makes rotations in the plane, which is SO(2)~U(1).
 


thank so much you, guys! Got it
 


Theoretically there could very well be an U(1) generator as well.

In the case of QCD there could be a U(3) = U(1) * SU(3) symmetry which would result a 9th generator represented by the 3*3 identity matrix. But this U(1) symmetry would result in a new color-force similar to an el.-mag. like long range force. b/c we do not observe this long range force in nature this extra U(1) factor has to be excluded.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top