The GIMPS project has found a new Mersenne prime number: M42.

  • Thread starter Thread starter T.Rex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime Project
T.Rex
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
The GIMPS project is aimed to search (and find !) new Mersenne prime numbers.
It has just discovered a new huge prime number, named M42, which has been verified with a different software on a different computer architecture (a third verification is on the way).
It is the 8th Mersenne prime number found by the GIMPS.
(Mersenne prime numbers are the biggest proved prime numbers.)

This number is: M42 = 2^{25964951} - 1

All details are available at: A new prime .

Regards,

Tony
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Awesome I heard a new one was probably discovered but good to see it's true.
 
I had their software on my computer before I cleaned it. Good to see a new one found.
 
M42 isn't prime. this number is the 42nd mersenne prime found, but its NOT M42. its M25964951, that's a notation error.

nowhere in the original press release or at www.mersenne.org does it call the 42nd discovered mersenne prime M42, it might not even be the 42nd mersenne prime in order of size. its just the 42nd confirmed mersenne prime discovered.
 
Last edited:
You are perfectly right !

The notation Mq means that q is a prime number. Here q=25964951 .
M25964951 is the 42nd prime Mersenne number ever found and we are not yet sure there is not another Mersenne prime before.

I used M42 because we used it in the GIMPS forum as a short way to name it and I forgot to change my vocabulary when talking in this forum.

Thanks for noticeing and fixing my mistake !

Tony
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
60
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
4K
2
Replies
67
Views
14K
Back
Top