The Gravitational Dance: Calculating Fred & Betty's KE

  • Thread starter Thread starter rdn98
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitational
AI Thread Summary
The potential energy of the asteroid system Betty-Fred, calculated using the gravitational potential energy formula, is 9.587E-6 J, which is also the total kinetic energy just before their collision. To find the kinetic energy of asteroid Fred, the conservation of momentum principle is applied, considering that the system starts stationary. By calculating the velocity of Fred using the derived equations, it is determined to be 0.0078 m/s. Consequently, the kinetic energy of asteroid Fred just before the collision is 0.457 J.
rdn98
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Deep in space, two small asteroids wind up stationary, 1.7 km apart. Asteroid Fred has a mass of 14900 kg and Asteroid Betty has a mass of 16400 kg.
***********
a) Assuming the zero of gravitational potential energy to be when the asteroids are in contact, what is the potential energy of the two asteriod system Betty-Fred?
b) Betty and Fred start moving towards each other due to their mutual graviatation attraction. What is the total kinetic energy of the two asteriod system just before their collide?
c) What is the kinetic energy of asteroid Fred just before their collide?
***

For a and b, its going to be the same answer. By using the U=Gm1m2/r equation, its giong to be the same energy. I mean, the potential energy gets converted entirely to kinetic energy. so the answer was 9.587E-6 J

now for part c, I am stuck. HOw do I go about breaking up that total Kinetic energy into two parts, which will ultimately help me find the answer for Fred?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a clue:

Remember that since no external force is working on it, momentum for this system must be conserved. And since they start out stationary, the total momentum is always ... what?
 


To find the kinetic energy of asteroid Fred just before they collide, we can use the conservation of energy principle. Since the total kinetic energy of the system is equal to the potential energy at the beginning, we can equate the two equations:

KE of system = PE of system

1/2mv^2 + 1/2mv^2 = Gm1m2/r

Simplifying, we get:

mv^2 = Gm1m2/r

Plugging in the values for mass and distance, we get:

14900v^2 = (6.67E-11)(14900)(16400)/(1.7E3)

Solving for v, we get:

v = 0.0078 m/s

Now, to find the kinetic energy of asteroid Fred, we can use the equation:

KE = 1/2mv^2

Plugging in the mass of Fred and the calculated velocity, we get:

KE = 1/2(14900)(0.0078)^2 = 0.457 J

Therefore, the kinetic energy of asteroid Fred just before they collide is 0.457 J.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top