The gravitational force of energy

AI Thread Summary
Energy can be treated similarly to mass in gravitational equations by substituting mass (M) with energy (E/c²), suggesting that energy itself has a gravitational influence. This approach is straightforward for internal energy, such as heat or chemical energy, but becomes complex for kinetic energy, particularly at velocities approaching the speed of light. The discussion highlights the need to consider Einstein's field equations for a complete understanding of kinetic energy's gravitational effects. Additionally, the concept of gravitoelectromagnetism is introduced as a potential framework for understanding these gravitational interactions. Overall, the relationship between energy and gravitational force remains a nuanced topic requiring further exploration.
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
11,326
Reaction score
8,750
Energy gravitates. Is is so simple as to replace M in gravitational euqations with E/c*c ?

F=\frac{G*M\underline{1}*M\underline{2}}{DM\underline{1,2}}=F=\frac{G*E\underline{1}*E\underline{2}}{c\overline{4}*DM\underline{1,2}}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whoops, forgive me for screwing up the latex. I clicked on post too early.
 
Wouldn't you just replace it with E after finding the equivalent energy content for an objects mass?
 
If it's internal energy, e.g. heat or chemical, yes it is that simple. I'm not sure about kinetic energy though. Especially when the object's velocity is close to c.
 
For kinetic energy, I believe the answer lies in the Einstein field equations, but I don't know how to solve the Weyl curvature. But, there is a frame dragging effect from a moving mass, which creates a gravity which isn't radial. There's a formal analogy to magnetism, called gravitoelectromagnetism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitoelectromagnetism, which might answer your question.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top