The harmonic series isn't bounded

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the harmonic series and its properties, specifically addressing the boundedness of the series formed by the sum of reciprocals of natural numbers. The original poster expresses confusion regarding a specific part of a proof related to the convergence of series and the behavior of partial sums.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the reasoning behind the inequality involving the sum of terms from 1/(n+1) to 1/2n, questioning the validity of the assertion that this sum is greater than 1/2. They discuss the nature of the terms in the sequence and their relationships to each other.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the inequality and the reasoning behind it. Some participants provide explanations and reiterate the logic of the terms involved, but a definitive consensus on the clarity of the proof has not been reached.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is following a proof from a textbook, indicating a structured approach to understanding the topic. The discussion includes attempts to clarify specific mathematical assertions without providing complete solutions.

Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



My mind is blown. You'd think there would be some number which 1/1 + 1/3 + 1/4 + ... stays below, but I guess there isn't. However, before I believe this, I need one part of my book's proof clarified.

Homework Equations



Theorem I. Suppose that un ≥ 0 for every n. Then the series ∑un is convergent if and only if the sequence {sn} of partial sums is bounded.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm just following along the proof in the book.

sn = 1 + 1/2 + ... + 1/n.

s2n = sn + 1/(n+1) + 1/(n+2) + ... + 1/2n > sn + 1/2,

since

1/(n+1) + 1/(n+2) + ... + 1/2n > n * (1/2n) = 1/2.

^ That's the part I don't understand. Please explain why that is true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]\frac{1}{n+1}\geq\frac{1}{2n}[/tex]. Also [tex]\frac{1}{n+2}\geq\frac{1}{2n}[/tex], [tex]\frac{1}{n+3}\geq\frac{1}{2n}[/tex],..., [tex]\frac{1}{2n}\geq\frac{1}{2n}[/tex].

So adding up each term between 1/(n+1) and 1/2n is adding up n terms, each of which is at least 1/2n. The sum must then be at least 1/2n+1/2n+1/2n+...+1/2n=n*(1/2n)=1/2
 
Jamin2112 said:
1/(n+1) + 1/(n+2) + ... + 1/2n > n * (1/2n) = 1/2.

^ That's the part I don't understand. Please explain why that is true.

Each term in the sequence on the LHS is greater than the next, so each term is greater than 1/(2n):

[tex]\frac{1}{n+1} > \frac{1}{n+2}, ~ \frac{1}{n+2} > \frac{1}{n+3}, \ldots \frac{1}{2n-1} > \frac{1}{2n}.[/tex]

It follows that the sum of all terms is greater than n(1/(2n)).
 
Office_Shredder said:
[tex]\frac{1}{n+1}\geq\frac{1}{2n}[/tex]. Also [tex]\frac{1}{n+2}\geq\frac{1}{2n}[/tex], [tex]\frac{1}{n+3}\geq\frac{1}{2n}[/tex],..., [tex]\frac{1}{2n}\geq\frac{1}{2n}[/tex].

So adding up each term between 1/(n+1) and 1/2n is adding up n terms, each of which is at least 1/2n. The sum must then be at least 1/2n+1/2n+1/2n+...+1/2n=n*(1/2n)=1/2

2367515373_515ff7a325.jpg
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K