The Kirchhoff diffraction formula with small wavelength

zhouhao
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The fresnel-kirchhoff diffraction formula could explain diffraction,I think it should also produce the result with relatively small wavelength and large width slit in which case there is no diffraction.
730px-_Kirchhoff_1a.svg.png

Homework Equations


##U(P)=\frac{ia}{2\lambda}\int_S\frac{e^{ik(s+r)}}{sr}[(cos(n,r)-cos(n,s)]dS##

The Attempt at a Solution


when ##\lambda##(wavelength) is very small,the ##U(P)## would very large and seems not equal to ##\frac{ae^ir_{P_0P}}{r_{P_0P}}##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
One suggestion would be to try it for an observation point that is directly on axis, and use a circular aperture so that the diffraction equations are readily workable. I do expect the diffraction equations for small wavelength and large aperture would give very nearly a shadow when using a single point source on one side of the aperture, but the equations are cumbersome enough, that it might be somewhat difficult to show for the general case.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top