The mesure of distances using the redshift

  • Thread starter Thread starter houhou.trad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Redshift
AI Thread Summary
To determine the recessional velocity of galaxies, the redshift law is applied, which compares observed and source wavelengths. The source wavelength is identified through known spectral lines of elements, primarily hydrogen and helium, which have distinctive patterns. These spectral lines can be measured in a lab, allowing astronomers to recognize shifts towards longer wavelengths due to redshift. The patterns of these lines act like fingerprints, making it easier to identify elements in galaxies. Thus, the source wavelengths are known because of the consistent spectral signatures of abundant elements in the universe.
houhou.trad
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
in order to determine the recessional velocity of same galaxy we use the redshift law:
[(observed wavelength) -(source wavelength) ]/source wavelength=v/c
The problem I have found here:confused: is how we can know the source wavelength.
thinks.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Different elements have distinctive lines in their spectra. These lines have known wavelengths you can measure in the lab. Hot hydrogen gas and plasma have distinctive patterns of spectral lines that you can recognize, and see how much it has been shifted towards longer wavelengths.

Other elements also play a role.
 
marcus said:
Different elements have distinctive lines in their spectra. These lines have known wavelengths you can measure in the lab. Hot hydrogen gas and plasma have distinctive patterns of spectral lines that you can recognize, and see how much it has been shifted towards longer wavelengths.

Other elements also play a role.
Thus, want you say that we know the source wavelength of these galaxies because we know already the elements that constituting them?
 
It is hard NOT to know, most of the universe is made of hydrogen and helium and elements have distinctive PATTERNs of lines, like 3 close together with the longer one twice as far from the middle, and relative brightnesses of the lines within a pattern

It is like a face or fingerprint, you just see "oh! those are the hydrogen lines, but just shifted over!" or Oh I see the bright yellow sodium line but it is shifted over into the red. And the shifts are all consistent, by the same ratio.

So it is hard to mistake the light of a particular abundant element, at least with nearby galaxies where we get a good sample of the light.
 
Last edited:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top