Is the DNA Contamination in Serial Killer Case Still a Mystery?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Serial
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the peculiar situation regarding the presence of fingerprints only in unsolved crime cases, raising questions about why they are absent in solved cases. Participants express surprise over the lack of indictments related to a cotton plant and speculate on the implications of needing DNA evidence for easily solvable crimes. Concerns are raised about the potential for contamination in DNA testing, with suggestions that random testing of swabs has yielded no evidence, indicating that contamination may be rare. The role of chance in these investigations is also highlighted, emphasizing the complexities involved in forensic evidence collection and analysis.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,615608,00.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is still rather strange that, if I understand it correctly, the fingerprints have only surfaced in unsolved crime cases. Why should not the fingerprints be present at the sites of numerous indubitably solved crimes as well??
 
I'm surprised that they didn't indict a cotton plant.
 
arildno said:
It is still rather strange that, if I understand it correctly, the fingerprints have only surfaced in unsolved crime cases. Why should not the fingerprints be present at the sites of numerous indubitably solved crimes as well??

Less likely that they would need DNA evidence for easily solvable crimes. If they did need DNA evidence in a situation where it is not easily found and picked up the wrong DNA they would likely lose the trail of the real killer leaving the case unsolved.
Just an idea. Chance could be playing a big role aswell.
 
Whatever happened with including a negative control? The DNA should have showed up in there as well.
 
Monique said:
Whatever happened with including a negative control? The DNA should have showed up in there as well.
Apparently they are still uncertain about the contamination after testing swabs randomly and finding nothing so there may only be one in every who-knows-how-many swabs that are contaminated.
 

Thread 'Status Update by JRMichler'

Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
View full post »

Similar threads

News Renewable energy EU under pressure.
Replies
31
Views
9K
Familial DNA leads to Grim Sleeper arrest
Replies
27
Views
5K
B How Did Polonium-210 Contaminate London in the Litvinenko Case?
Replies
9
Views
2K
Did the Trayvon Martin Case Expose Flaws in Stand Your Ground Laws?
3
Replies
120
Views
13K
News U.S. Supreme Court Hears Monsanto Seed Patent Case
2
Replies
73
Views
13K
Did Katrina Release Killer Dolphins in the US?
Replies
8
Views
4K
Early Hominin DNA: 400,000 Year Old Mystery
Replies
1
Views
3K
Cherry Tree Visits ISS: Japan's Space Mystery
Replies
3
Views
3K
Marburg case in Gueckedou prefecture, Guinea, W. Africa
Replies
1
Views
1K
Who is the Killer at the Beach Barbecue?
Replies
9
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top