The multiple derivatives of position

AI Thread Summary
Placement and presentment are not recognized as technical terms in physics; they refer to general concepts of positioning and orientation. Action, however, is a significant term in physics, particularly in mechanics and quantum mechanics, and is associated with Planck's constant, which has units of action. The discussion clarifies that placement relates to the arrangement of objects, while presentment pertains to their presentation. Understanding these terms can enhance comprehension of physical concepts. Overall, the distinction between general language and technical terminology is crucial in physics discussions.
albertrichardf
Messages
165
Reaction score
11
Hi all,
I came across the term placement, and presentment and the likes. I was wondering what they may mean in physics. I tried a search but the answers were not very clear. I was also wondering what action means in physics.
Any answers will be appreciated. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have not seen the terms placement and presentment used as technical terms in physics. Placement is just where and how you put something ... like placement of table ware at a banquet, Presentment is how somethig is presented .. perhaps its orientation. These are both English descriptive terms; just follow the dictionary definitions.

Action is a technical term from physics. It is used in mechanics and quantum mechanics. Plank's constant has units of action.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

Surface tension and Young's contact angle
Replies
3
Views
1K
Uses of the average velocity/speed
Replies
7
Views
1K
I Drag Coefficient of a 'flexible' object (e.g. a piece of paper)
Replies
4
Views
2K
B According to Newton's 3rd Law....
2
Replies
58
Views
7K
I Extending Newton's laws -- Is the concept of force still defined?
Replies
35
Views
4K
I Pressurized containers: Stress distribution and large displacements
2
Replies
69
Views
4K
Negative potential energy vs Positive potential energy
Replies
14
Views
6K
Can the kinetic energy be a function of the position vector?
Replies
8
Views
4K
Work done on an object given a variable mass
Replies
5
Views
4K
"External" potential energies strike back
Replies
6
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top