The Mysteries of Supersymmetry: A Comprehensive Thesis Guide

shakeel
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
i am writting a thesis in supersymmetry if someone help me please
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shakeel said:
i am writting a thesis in supersymmetry if someone help me please


Shakeel,

The best way to get a question answered is to ask one. No one here knows what you need to know about or don't understand. The more specific the question the more likely you will be to get an answer. I hope you don't think I am being mean, I just want you to understand that most likely you will not see a lot of people rushing to answer your un-asked questions. I don't know much about supersymmetry, or why we need it, but simply asking for "help" (with what?) will not get you anywhere.
good luck,
Norm
 
Norman said:
Shakeel,

The best way to get a question answered is to ask one. No one here knows what you need to know about or don't understand. The more specific the question the more likely you will be to get an answer. I hope you don't think I am being mean, I just want you to understand that most likely you will not see a lot of people rushing to answer your un-asked questions. I don't know much about supersymmetry, or why we need it, but simply asking for "help" (with what?) will not get you anywhere.
good luck,
Norm[/QUOTE
actualy i want some helping material like papers on net because in pakistan there is not much books on this topic espacially and i can not aford to by books do to poor financial conditions.Iam a pakistani student keep in mind please thank you
 
There is a very good place to check on the net if you are a physicist :

Warren Siegel's home page

You will find here a huge course entitled "Fields", another one on string field theory, and for your concern, the Superspace is also available. Note that whenever you are tired, you can also check a small but unforgetable article, named Stuperspace.
 
Shakeel, should I say you are a lazy researcher!
I have done a lot of work using the net as a main source of information about SUSY and I have done a lot of search and could find fortunes.
Please give urself a chance and do search, the nat has a lot and you can use it all.
And yes, as norman said, ask a specific question.
And not to waste ur time, here is a link

xxx.lanl.gov

it is called the arXiv.

Max
 
Last edited:
Neat link, humanino. I have bookmarked it and will continue reading it soon.

One of the things Siegel says, which should be read by all P.F. members before they start a thread on why their own ideas on relativity or quantum theory are superior, is:

"I have proven that special relativity/quantum mechanics is wrong."
You mean you did an experiment whose results disagree with the predictions of that theory? I didn't think so. You mean you proved it is self-contradictory? Not possible: Mathematically it's an elementary system, whose consistency is easy to check. You might as well claim that you can prove 2+2=5. (If you think you can do that, I'm willing to give you $2+$2 change for a $5 bill.) If you think you have found an inconsistency, you have probably made an assumption that is not implied by the theory. The fact is that these theories are not only well confirmed by experiment, but practical use is made of them every single day.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
493
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
573
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Back
Top