The Mysteries of the Metaperiodic Table

  • Thread starter Thread starter Antymattar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Table
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the structure of atoms and the behavior of electrons within them, sparked by interest in Theodore Gray's book "The Elements." Key points include the understanding that elements are defined by their number of protons, while the arrangement of electrons, particularly in the outer shell, influences their chemical properties. The lanthanides are highlighted as an example where elements share the same outer electron configuration but still exhibit distinct identities due to their inner electrons. The conversation also touches on electron packing, which minimizes energy and is affected by electron-electron repulsion, explaining why certain orbitals have varying energy levels despite proximity to the nucleus. The concept of excited states is introduced, where electrons can occupy higher energy levels temporarily, leading to the idea that manipulating electron positions could theoretically create new elements with unique properties.
Antymattar
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello. I recently read Theodore Gray`s book "The Elements" and was extremely fascinated by the small world of atoms. I was fascinated about the structure of atoms and wanted to know more about why and how they are composed.

After studying a bit I hit a bit of a curiosity. Why don some elements atoms don`t pack their electrons in a way so that they are not always as close to the core as possible? Is there an explanation to this? I was also very interested ion the lanthanide section of the periodic table. I heard that an element is defined by their outer ring of electrons, thought, that can clearely not be the case considering that the lanthanides have the same amount of electrons on the outer ring. So one must conclude that the inner electrons also define the element in some way.

Now what does this have to do with the title? I was wondering, would it be possible to assemble atoms in a way that you can define in what ring the electrons are located. Would it be possible to make a hydrogen atom but have it`s electron be somwhere in the 7p orbit?

If so then I soppose that that would create a completely new element with new properties.

I appologise for any bad grammar you may come across(I`m Latvian)
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Wow! that's some good stuff there.
 
Antymattar said:
Would it be possible to make a hydrogen atom but have it`s electron be somwhere in the 7p orbit?

If so then I soppose that that would create a completely new element with new properties.

Elements are determined by the number of protons (the atomic number). An atom with an electron in a higher-energy state is called an excited atom. (If the number of electrons doesn't match the number of protons, it's called an ion; if you adjust the number of neutrons, you create different isotopes.)
 
Antymattar said:
After studying a bit I hit a bit of a curiosity. Why don some elements atoms don`t pack their electrons in a way so that they are not always as close to the core as possible? Is there an explanation to this? I was also very interested ion the lanthanide section of the periodic table. I heard that an element is defined by their outer ring of electrons, thought, that can clearely not be the case considering that the lanthanides have the same amount of electrons on the outer ring. So one must conclude that the inner electrons also define the element in some way.

Electrons pack in such a way as to minimize their energy. While distance from the nucleus is one important factor determining the energies of the orbitals, it is not the only factor. In atoms containing more than one electron, electron-electron repulsion also plays a role in determining the energies of the orbitals. These interactions are responsible for the fact that, say the 4s orbital has a lower energy than the 3d orbital even though the electrons in the 3d orbital are, on average, closer to the nucleus than electrons in the 4s orbital.

As Mapes mentioned, the identity of an element is by definition defined by the number of protons in its nucleus. However, the chemical properties of an atom are defined by the electronic structure of the outer shell of electrons. Therefore, atoms with similar outer electron configurations, such as the lanthanides, will have very similar chemical properties. In fact, the chemistries of the lanthanides are so similar that it is notoriously difficult to separate them from one another. In most cases, we cannot separate them based on chemical properties; rather, our separation methods must be based on their physical properties like the sizes of the atoms (and their ions).
 
There are actually atoms like you describe. We call them excited states. When an atom abosrbs a photon it electrons arranges in a higher energy configuration. They are usually very shortlived and a photon is given off again. However, there are exceptions. Helium can be excited to a state with the electon spins parallell which can be kept for long periods, minutes if I remember correctly. It is called metastable helium. Google it, I am sure you'll find it interesting.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top