The Mystifying Sphere: Is Its Curve Defined by a Euclidian Degree?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mattius_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sphere
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the properties of a sphere and its relationship to Euclidean geometry. Participants explore whether the curve of a sphere can be defined in terms of angles and if it serves as a standard in higher mathematics. One user proposes a method to relate the perimeter of a circle to a symmetrical polygon, suggesting that this could yield a defined degree. The conversation also highlights the sphere's efficiency as a shape in nature. Overall, the complexity of the sphere and its mathematical implications are emphasized.
Mattius_
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The Sphere! Mystifying!

Is it just me or is a sphere a truly remarkable thing? I cannot ponder its properties so ill ask a few questions...

Is the curve of a sphere perpetual standard of somesort?? is it's value a standard variable in some higher level math??

Being a guy who needs elementary comparisons, can we equate this curve with a average angle of somesort in euclidian degrees?***

***
the best solution i have come up with here is taking a perimeter of a circle and putting it on top of the perimeter of X-agon(meaning an X sided symmetrical shape) and lining up the linear sides of the X-agon with the circle's perimeter so that each side intersects the circles perimeter twice and also so that the middle length of the X-agon is exactly double the length of each of the 2 outside parts of the side. (sometimes a million words cannot define a picture, but try)The end result from a satisfactory X-agon would be a defined degree, Right?

anyways, am i just crazy or is the sphere an incredibly complex and sophisticated body.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think youre crazy lol :wink:
 
I was thinking the same thing the other day, mind you that does not not mean I disagree with the above post :/
 
I like donut shapes myself.:smile:
 
although we have concluded that i am crazy, we still haven't verified my attempt to bring an angle to a circle... any thoughts on this?
 
Originally posted by Mattius_
although we have concluded that i am crazy, we still haven't verified my attempt to bring an angle to a circle... any thoughts on this?

The angle is 90 degrees to a perpendicular line at a constant length from the center point for a circle and any angle within 360 degrees to a perpendicular line in the z axis and 90 degrees from the y-axis at a constant length from the center point for a sphere.

Another interesting thing about a sphere is that it is nature's most efficient shape.

Had to edit a bit, I forgot the z axis for the sphere.
 
Last edited:
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
48
Views
11K
Back
Top