The Nut Torque Problem: Analyzing Pressure Differences

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gh778
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the mechanics of a bolt and nut system with distinct red and green surfaces, where the green surface is positioned closer to the center than the red. It explores the implications of applying equal fluid pressure to both surfaces and how this affects the torque on the nut. The conversation highlights that despite the torque differences due to varying radii, the forces acting on the bolt and nut balance out, leading to no net torque. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding equilibrium and the role of surface angles in force distribution. Ultimately, the conclusion drawn is that the differing slopes of the threads prevent the nut from turning under torque, even when pressure is applied.
Gh778
Messages
419
Reaction score
0
With a standard bolt and nut. Create 2 areas, red and green, red surface = green surface. Green surface is closer to the center than red surface. Red surface is between up surface of bolt and bot surface of nut. Green surface is between down surface of bolt and top surface of nut. We put the same pressure from fluid in green and red volumes. Like surfaces are equal the bolt can move up or down without need energy. The nut turn only and the bolt move up/down only. Like green surface is closer to the center, the torque on the nut is bigger with red surface. The outside pressure is lower than pressure in red/green volumes. Like this it seems the nut turn with a torque, where is the problem ?
 

Attachments

  • bolt and nut.jpg
    bolt and nut.jpg
    26.8 KB · Views: 517
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Gh778,

It seems your problem is not solved yet. I don't think its that complicated but you jump from one example to another one.
Another thing is that you are not satisfied with proofs based on equilibrium. For example if a chair is placed on a flat surface, and it is not moving, due to equilibrium, the total reaction forces from the surface on the chair has no x and y component , but you want to calculate the forces on each leg ( the legs have some angle rather than 90 degree with the surface) and prove that the total x and y components are zero.
 
Yes, sorry I change and I don't explain all I think :( I thought with square thread, you're remind ? It's not like the drawing show; With square thread we have calculate the torque increase with the radius not like a circular thread where the torque is the same with different radius. Imagine the bolt move up/down, the up force can be equal to the down force. The nut has a torque due to the difference of radius and when it turn it give energy. Where is the problem in this case ?
 
The force is canceled by the reaction from the nut thread because the bolt thread is not free to move alone the force direction. All the force due to pressure is normal to the surface and the the bolt thread can't move in that direction, means ALL the force is cancelled. Then what remains to cause a net torque?
 
The slope is different that's why the nut don't turn with torque I think.
 
Even with zero pressure on one of the surfaces, the net torque is zero.
 
Last edited:
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top