The Optimal Prism: Diamond or Glass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bradracer18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prism
AI Thread Summary
A diamond is a better prism than glass due to its higher refractive index of 2.42 compared to glass's 1.52, which enhances light refraction. While diamonds may contain internal structures that can complicate light passage, their ability to create brilliant colors and flashes is attributed to this high refractive index. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding light refraction in determining the effectiveness of a prism. Ultimately, diamonds are valued not just for their beauty but also for their optical properties. This knowledge is essential for explaining the concept of prisms in a physics context.
Bradracer18
Messages
203
Reaction score
0
Which makes a better prism??

Homework Statement



Hey guys, I'm helping my girlfriend once again, in physics 101! I'm not used to these "theory" questions...haha

Anyways, the question asks:Which would make a better prism, a diamond or glass?

I guess, I chose glass...because a diamond has a lot of little prisms inside of it(I think)...so, that would defeat the purpose, in my opinion) Also, a diamond distorts light...I don't know...

Need some help, and need to be able to explain it to her, so she can understand it for the final. Make me understand it first, please!

Thanks,
Brad

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
you're thinking of diamond that is already cut and polished into a certain shape.
prisms use the refraction of light from one medium to the next. the better prism will have a higher refractive index..
 
So, according to you...Diamond is a better prism(2.42) with glass being(1.52)...just found those off of the net.
 
that's right
 
and likely why diamonds cost a lot more than glass, as in where does all the flash and color come from?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top