The position of the equilibrium altered

AI Thread Summary
The position of equilibrium in a reaction can be influenced by changes in temperature, pressure, concentration, and the presence of a catalyst. Increasing temperature typically favors the endothermic direction of a reaction, resulting in more products if the forward reaction absorbs heat. Conversely, decreasing temperature favors the exothermic direction, leading to more reactants if the forward reaction releases heat. For the reaction H2 + I2 ⇌ 2HI, understanding the enthalpy change is crucial to predict how equilibrium shifts with temperature changes. Le Chatelier's Principle is a key concept in these discussions, as it explains how systems respond to changes in conditions.
topboim
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
the position of the equilibrium can be altered by changing the temperature,Pressure, Concentration and Catalyst.

which way will the equilibrium move if we Increase and Decrease the temperture?
would there be more reactant or more product if we change the temperture?

i would like to learn more about this, using the reaction
H2 (g) + I2 (g)\Leftrightarrow2HI (g)
Hydrogen + Iodinn \LeftrightarrowHydrogen iodide

i am in high school. so it will be helpfull if anyone would break down the answer for me
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
topboim,

We can not write down answers to homework/textbook problems. In fact, we can only help you after you first show what effort you have put into attempting the problem.

What I can tell you is that for the question to be complete, you also need to include information about the enthalpy change for the reaction.

Please read the Forum Guidelines - click the Rules tab at the top of the page.
 
Last edited:
Hint: have you heard of Le Chatelier's Principle?
 
yes, i have. i have done the work and waiting for a reply from my teacher

thanks anyways
 

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Is the System at Equilibrium with Given Concentrations?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Chemistry Question about the Butler-Volmer equation in electrochemistry
Replies
1
Views
3K
Chemistry How to reason about Gibbs energy change due to entropy not enthalpy?
Replies
4
Views
1K
Chemistry A calculation of enthalpy, entropy, and Gibbs energy of vaporization
Replies
1
Views
1K
Chemistry How to think about increased temperature effect on water autoprotolysis equilibrium constant?
Replies
4
Views
1K
Equilibrium: Le Chatelier's Principle and CaCO3 Decomposition
Replies
1
Views
2K
Chemistry Calculation of bond energy of oxygen gas at 0K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Chemistry Equilibrium Partial Pressures
Replies
3
Views
2K
Chemistry Does Combusting Different Amounts of Propane Change Final Temperature?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Chemistry Finding rate constant from pressure change in an experiment
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top