The radii of charges moving in a magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
When a proton and an electron with the same kinetic energies enter a magnetic field, they both achieve circular orbits, and the ratio of their orbit radii can be derived from the equation r = mv/qB. The discussion highlights confusion over using kinetic energy versus centripetal force, clarifying that the correct approach involves using the Lorentz force. The mass and charge of each particle lead to different velocities, affecting their orbit radii. A participant acknowledges a mistake in their calculations, mistaking the formulas for kinetic energy and centripetal force. The conversation concludes with a light-hearted exchange about common errors in physics problems.
satxer
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
1. A proton and an electron, with the same kinetic energies, enter a magnetic field and both attain circular orbits. What is the ratio of the radii of the orbits to each other?



KE = qvB = (mv^2)/r --> r = mv/qB



3. We know both q values and both m values. The B value is irrelevant. I've tried substituting arbitrary measurements for the velocity and radii of one of the particles, but that still leaves me with two variables to solve for the other particle (v and r). I have no idea what to do now...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
satxer said:
1. A proton and an electron, with the same kinetic energies, enter a magnetic field and both attain circular orbits. What is the ratio of the radii of the orbits to each other?



KE = qvB = (mv^2)/r --> r = mv/qB



3. We know both q values and both m values. The B value is irrelevant. I've tried substituting arbitrary measurements for the velocity and radii of one of the particles, but that still leaves me with two variables to solve for the other particle (v and r). I have no idea what to do now...

I don't think your equation is correct. The Lorentz Force gives that the centripital force is qvB, so it couldn't be the KE. Use KE = 1/2 mv^2 for each particle. Different masses give different velocities. Then use the Lorentz Force...
 
OMG you're right. Thanks so much. How stupid of me. I got the formula (mv^2)/r confused with (mv^2)/2

Please be so kind as to assuage my severely bruised ego with anecdotes of any past careless mistakes you have made :redface:
 
satxer said:
OMG you're right. Thanks so much. How stupid of me. I got the formula (mv^2)/r confused with (mv^2)/2

Please be so kind as to assuage my severely bruised ego with anecdotes of any past careless mistakes you have made :redface:

No worries. Lorentz force problems are some of my favorites. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top