The rate of current through a solenoid - clarification needed.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the relationship between electric and magnetic fields in a solenoid, particularly through Faraday's law. Participants clarify that the electric field induced by a changing magnetic field is circular around the solenoid, not through it. The line integral is taken over a circular path because the electric field is constant along that path due to symmetry. It is emphasized that a changing magnetic field will induce an electric field around all solenoids. The conversation highlights the importance of comparing this scenario to Ampere's law to better understand the relationship between electric and magnetic fields.
Kruum
Messages
217
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://www.aijaa.com/img/b/00106/3735947.jpg

Homework Equations



\epsilon =- \frac {d \Phi}{dt}=- \frac {d BA}{dt}= \oint \vec{E} \cdot d \vec{l}
B= \mu _0nIA, where n is solenoid's turns per meter.

The Attempt at a Solution



I was able to solve this through trial and error, almost. What I got is \epsilon =- \frac { \mu _0 nAdI}{dt} \Longrightarrow \frac {dI}{dt}=- \frac {E2 \pi r_1}{ \mu _0n \pi r_{2}^2}=-9.21 \frac{A}{s}, where r1=0.035m and r2=0.011m. Our assistant teacher wasn't able to tell me why we to take the line integral over a circle in \epsilon = \oint \vec{E} \cdot d \vec{l} and why my sign is wrong. Can somebody help?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Kruum,

Kruum said:

Homework Statement



http://www.aijaa.com/img/b/00106/3735947.jpg

Homework Equations



\epsilon =- \frac {d \Phi}{dt}=- \frac {d BA}{dt}= \oint \vec{E} \cdot d \vec{l}
B= \mu _0nIA, where n is solenoid's turns per meter.

The Attempt at a Solution



I was able to solve this through trial and error, almost. What I got is \epsilon =- \frac { \mu _0 nAdI}{dt} \Longrightarrow \frac {dI}{dt}=- \frac {E2 \pi r_1}{ \mu _0n \pi r_{2}^2}=-9.21 \frac{A}{s}, where r1=0.035m and r2=0.011m. Our assistant teacher wasn't able to tell me why we to take the line integral over a circle in \epsilon = \oint \vec{E} \cdot d \vec{l} and why my sign is wrong. Can somebody help?

The point in taking the line integral over a circle is because the E field is constant all along that circular path (from symmetry). (By constant I mean that it has the same magnitude and has the orientation (tangent) relative to each point along the circle.) That allows us to take E out of the integral and then the integral is just the circumference of the circle.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the hasty reply, alphysicist!

alphysicist said:
The point in taking the line integral over a circle is because the E field is constant all along that circular path (from symmetry).

So the electric field is circular around the solenoid? If so, I misinterpreted the text and thought the E field went through the solenoid.
 
Kruum said:
Thanks for the hasty reply, alphysicist!

Yes, I almost missed your post completely. The first time I saw it had already gone off the front page.

So the electric field is circular around the solenoid? If so, I misinterpreted the text and thought the E field went through the solenoid.


The magnetic field goes straight throught the solenoid, and the changing magnetic field will induce an electric field around it.

I think it's useful if you compare Faraday's law for this problem with Ampere's law applied to a long straight wire. That way you can see the relationship between E and the changing B field from this problem, is similar to the relationship between an infinite straight current and it's magnetic field.
 
alphysicist said:
I think it's useful if you compare Faraday's law for this problem with Ampere's law applied to a long straight wire. That way you can see the relationship between E and the changing B field from this problem, is similar to the relationship between an infinite straight current and it's magnetic field.

So is this the case with all solenoids? Their magnetic field will create an electric field around them?

Oh, and hopefully my thank yous didn't come out negative. I really appreciate your replies.
 
Kruum said:
So is this the case with all solenoids? Their magnetic field will create an electric field around them?

That sounds right, as long as the magnetic field is changing.

Oh, and hopefully my thank yous didn't come out negative. I really appreciate your replies.

I'm glad to help! (And for a moment I was wondering if your thank you was just a sarcastic comment. But I know how easy it is to misunderstand and be misunderstood with just text, so I always just take things at face value.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top