The ratio of the gravitational force between electron and proton

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of the gravitational force between an electron and a proton to the electrostatic force in a hydrogen atom. The initial calculation attempts used the formulas for gravitational and electrostatic forces, but the user struggled to arrive at the correct answer of 4.39 x 10^-40. After some back and forth, the user successfully found the answer and questioned how the ratio would change if the radius of the atom were doubled. It was concluded that the radius does not affect the ratio since it is not included in the final formula. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying fundamental physics equations to atomic models.
Richard Ros
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Some of the earliest atomic models held that the orbital velocity of an electron in an atom could be correlated with the radius of the atom. If the radius of the hydrogen atom is 10^−10 m and the electrostatic force is responsible for the circular motion of the electron, what is the ratio of the gravitational force between electron and proton to the electrostatic force? How does this ratio change if the radius of the atom is doubled? Explain {Answer: Fg/Fe = 4.39 x 10-40}.


Homework Equations



fe = (1/4πε0)*(q^2/r^2)
fg = G m^2/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer says Fg/Fe, so I divided fg/fe to get (Gm^2)/((9*10^9)q^2). I tried every different way possible but cannot manage to get the correct answer. Can anyone help me solve this problem, I've been stuck for a long time. I preferred you show me how to do it and how you got to the final answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are you using as the masses? One of them would be the mass of a proton; the other would be the mass of an electron.
 
Maybe my formula is wrong . Do you think this formula would be correct? G*me*mp/(9*10^9 n m^2/c^2)*q1*q2?
 
Oh never mind. I got the answer. How does the ratio change if radius if atom is doubled?
 
What do you think - does it look like the formula depends on the radius?
 
Since the radius isn't included in the formula. I'm assuming it doesn't matter?
 
Yep.
 
Back
Top