The set of squares of rational numbers is inductive

mrchris
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The set of squares of rational numbers is inductive

Homework Equations


definition of an inductive set

The Attempt at a Solution


sorry i know this is probably very easy to most but I am just learning analysis. Okay, so we can see that 1 is in the set because it is rational and 12 exists. Am I correct in thinking that it doesn't matter whether or not 12 is rational? I mean obviously it is, but aren't we really just checking to make sure that S(1) is defined? Then for the second part, we can take S(x) to be x2 whenever x=m/n, where m,n are integers and either m or n is odd. Again, aren't we basically proving that if S(x) exists, or (m2/n2) exists, then S(x+1), or [(m+n)2/n2] also exists. But then don't I also need to show that if x is rational, then so is x+1? Maybe i am reading way too much into this, but again I am new to these and I'm trying to understand exactly what I need to show.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you're pretty much correct. Let S be the set of the squares of rationals. To show it's inductive you need to show that 0 is in S (it is because 0 is 0^{2} and 0 is rational). Then you need to show that if x is in S, then x+1 is in S.

Then for two integers m,n x=\frac{m^{2}}{n^{2}} so x+1=\frac{m^{2} + n^{2}}{n^{2}}. The question then boils down to showing that this can be written in the form \frac{p^{2}}{q^{2}}, which isn't the same as \frac{(m+n)^{2}}{n^2}. They're rational by your definition of x, but the latter can't be assumed to be rational squared, unless you show it.
 
I'm fairly sure it's not inductive by the way.

Take x=\frac{1}{4}. Then x+1=\frac{5}{2^{2}}. This cannot be written in the form \frac{p^2}{q^2}.

Every time you multiply the fraction by some multiple \frac{5}{5} you get that the index of 5 increases to an even number on the top but then an odd number on the bottom. So you can never have an even index of 5 on the top and bottom. So the fraction is not part of the rationals squared.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top