The sign of F (dot) dl when finding electric potential

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of electric potential using the line integral of the electric field, specifically focusing on the sign of the differential length element \( dl \) when integrating from a reference point to a point of interest. Participants explore the implications of the direction of \( dl \) in relation to the electric field \( E \) and the resulting potential \( V \).

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the electric potential is defined as \( V = - \int_C E \cdot dl \) and questions the direction of \( dl \) when integrating from a reference point to the point of interest.
  • Another participant agrees that \( dl \) points from the reference point to the point of interest and discusses the implications of this direction when calculating potential from a point charge.
  • It is noted that when integrating from infinity to a point \( r \), \( E \cdot dl \) can be expressed as \( -E dr \), leading to confusion about the sign of the integral.
  • Participants discuss the relationship between \( dr \) and its sign, concluding that \( dr \) is negative when moving inward from infinity, which affects the sign of the integral.
  • There is a clarification that \( dl \) can be expressed as \( dr \, \hat{r} \) for both incoming and outgoing paths, with participants confirming this relationship.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical relationships involved, particularly regarding the signs of \( dr \) and \( dl \). However, there remains some uncertainty about the implications of these signs in the context of calculating electric potential, indicating that the discussion is not fully resolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the direction of \( dl \) and the interpretation of \( dr \) in the context of the electric field. The discussion does not resolve all aspects of these relationships, particularly in different scenarios.

EquationOfMotion
Messages
22
Reaction score
2
The electric potential can be defined as

V = - ∫C E⋅dl

where we are taking the line integral along C from some convenient reference point O, where we have set V = 0, to the point r we are trying to find the potential at. Of course, C can be any curve, but it's usually the most convenient to take it as a straight line from O to r.

Doesn't this mean dl will point in the direction from O to r? If that is the case, then say we're trying to find the potential at some distance from point charge +q and we've set our reference point infinitely far away. We have E = (kq/r^2) r(hat), where r(hat) is the spherical unit vector. Then, E⋅dl = E r(hat)⋅dl. But dl points from infinity to the point we're trying to find, and say that we've picked O so that dl points in the -r(hat) direction. Then, E⋅dl = -Edr, so evaluating the integral, we get V = -kq/r, which is evidently wrong.

I am aware that we can fix this by taking O to be somewhere else, but do you always take the line integral to be positive? If so, why? Or is there something else I'm missing?

EDIT: This seems like it'd fit better in General Physics. Woops.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello. Welcome to PF.
Your question is a good one. Most of us have gotten confused by this at one time or another.
EquationOfMotion said:
Doesn't this mean dl will point in the direction from O to r?
Yes
If that is the case, then say we're trying to find the potential at some distance from point charge +q and we've set our reference point infinitely far away. We have E = (kq/r^2) r(hat), where r(hat) is the spherical unit vector.
Yes. r(hat) points radially outward from q.
Then, E⋅dl = E r(hat)⋅dl. But dl points from infinity to the point we're trying to find, and say that we've picked O so that dl points in the -r(hat) direction.
OK
Then, E⋅dl = -Edr,
This is the mistake. The dot product of two vectors A and B is A⋅B = |A| |B| cosθ. So, in your case (coming in from infinity),
E⋅dl = |E| |dl| cos(180o) = -|E| |dl| = -E |dr|. When integrating from ∞ to r, how should you write |dr| in terms of dr? In particular, is dr a positive quantity or a negative quantity in this case? Hint: is r increasing or decreasing?

Or you can think about it more directly. When coming in from infinity, is E⋅dl a positive quantity or a negative quantity (assuming q is positive)? Now consider the expression E dr when coming in from infinity. Is this a positive quantity or a negative quantity?

Or, you can approach it by convincing yourself that dl = dr r(hat) whether you are coming in from infinity along a radial line or going out to infinity along a radial line. So, you can write E⋅dl = E⋅r(hat) dr for either incoming or outgoing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela and EquationOfMotion
TSny said:
When integrating from ∞ to r, how should you write |dr| in terms of dr? In particular, is dr a positive quantity or a negative quantity in this case? Hint: is r increasing or decreasing?

So since r is decreasing as you come in from infinity, |dr| = -dr.

TSny said:
Or you can think about it more directly. When coming in from infinity, is E⋅dl a positive quantity or a negative quantity (assuming q is positive)? Now consider the expression E dr when coming in from infinity. Is this a positive quantity or a negative quantity?

E⋅dl is negative, while E dr is positive so you need a negative sign. Nice!

TSny said:
Or, you can approach it by convincing yourself that dl = dr r(hat) whether you are coming in from infinity along a radial line or going out to infinity along a radial line. So, you can write E⋅dl = E⋅r(hat) dr for either incoming or outgoing.

Is this because going out it's obviously r(hat) dr, and coming in it's (-r(hat))(-dr)?

Thank you very much for your help!
 
EquationOfMotion said:
So since r is decreasing as you come in from infinity, |dr| = -dr.
Yes. dr represents the infinitesimal change in r. So dr is negative when coming in.

E⋅dl is negative, while Edr is positive so you need a negative sign.
E⋅dl is negative when coming in. But Edr is also negative when coming in. Remember, dr is a negative quantity since r is decreasing. So, E⋅dl has the same sign as Edr. You can check that these two expressions also have the same sign when going out. So, E⋅dl = Edr for both coming in and going out. (These statements assume that q is positive.)

going out it's obviously r(hat) dr, and coming in it's (-r(hat))(-dr)?
You are saying that dl = r(hat) dr when going out and that dl = -r(hat) (-dr) = r(hat) dr when coming in. Yes, that's true.

When coming in, dl = -r(hat) |dr| = -r(hat) (-dr) = r(hat) dr.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K