Is the Universe Really 30 Billion Light Years Across?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blhack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The universe is estimated to be about 13.8 billion years old, yet the observable universe's radius is approximately 47 billion light years due to its expansion. This means the universe was already extensive at its inception, allowing for a size greater than what might be calculated by simply doubling its age. Light from the most distant objects has taken time to reach us, and as the universe expands, these objects are now much farther away than their emitted light suggests. The consensus among cosmologists, including experts like Lineweaver and Wright, supports these figures, emphasizing the vastness of the universe. Understanding these concepts can help clarify common misconceptions about the universe's size.
Blhack
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
How big is the universe? This has been really bugging me since I read an article that said it was 30 billion light years across. This, however, did not seem possible to me, if the universe is about 8 billion years old, then isn't the maximum size the universe could be 16 billion light years across? I am complete novice in the field of physics, feel free to make fun of my stupidity but please in the process teach me something.
/wants to learn

blhack
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Originally posted by Blhack
How big is the universe? This has been really bugging me since I read an article that said it was 30 billion light years across. This, however, did not seem possible to me, if the universe is about 8 billion years old, then isn't the maximum size the universe could be 16 billion light years across? I am complete novice in the field of physics, feel free to make fun of my stupidity but please in the process teach me something.
/wants to learn

blhack

try this article by a professional cosmologist
it is not a popularization but it is pretty understandable and
has clear diagrams of the past, present, future size of the observable universe
gives the standard conventional view that has come to be shared by a lot of experts

http://arxiv.org/astro-ph/0305159

it is 34 pages PDF so takes a little while to download but worth it.

consensus view is that the universe did not start out at a point
but was already extensive at time zero
so there is not estimated upper bound on universe size
but there is an OBSERVABLE piece of it, which we can estimate the
size of

the most distant objects whose light is now reaching us are at this moment how many lightyears away? (they are farther away now than when they emitted the light that is now reaching us)
Lineweaver's article will tell you what the consensus view is on that. It is, if I recall correctly, around 40 billion light years.

So that is the radius of the universe which we are currently able to observe.

Hmm I just checked Lineweaver's figure 1 on page 6.
He says 47 billion light years for the current radius of the observable universe.

His figure for the age is larger than yours---around 13.7 or 13.8 billion.

The radius of the observable tends to be somewhat over 3 times
the age of the universe converted to light years. Age 14 billion multiplied by 3 gives 42 billion (but it is a bit more than 3 times so it is 47 billion instead)

Have to allow for the fact that the universe has expanded a whole bunch since the light from those distant things was emitted so they are a lot farther away than just the age converted to lightyears!

Lineweaver was a leader of the COBE satellite mapping of the cosmic microwave background.

You get the same consensus view from Ned Wright's website. He has FAQ. He teaches cosmology at UCLA and is a leader of the
current (WMAP) cosmic microwave background satellite observations.

Essentially the same figures on age and size no matter which expert you ask.

Remember you can always choose to disbelieve the expert consensus, if 47 billion light years sounds too big to be the radius of the observable universe!

You can find Ned Wright's cosmology FAQ on google, I think, but if you want I'll get the link.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Big. Really, really big. Just like is says in Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top