The Speed of a transverse wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a transverse wave in a copper wire when the temperature is lowered by 14°C. The initial speed of the wave is 46 m/s, with given parameters including the wire's cross-sectional area, linear density, coefficient of linear expansion, and Young's modulus. The tension in the wire must be recalculated after the temperature drop, considering the wire's contraction due to cooling. The formula for wave speed is adjusted to incorporate changes in tension resulting from the temperature change. Ultimately, the challenge lies in determining the new wave speed after accounting for these factors.
golriz
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
A copper wire, whose cross sectional area is 1.1 x 10 ^ -6 m^2, has a linear density of 7.0 x 10^-3 Kg/m and is strung between two walls. At the ambient temperature, a transverse wave travels with a speed of 46 m/s on this wire. The coefficient of linear expansion for copper is 17 x 10^-6 , and Youngs modulus for copper is 1.1 x 10^11 N/m^2. What will be the speed of the wave when the temperature is lowered by 14 C?


v = √(F/(m⁄L)) (1)
F = Y(∆L/L0)A (2)
∆L = α.L0.∆T ⇒ ∆L/L0 = α.∆T (3)



A = 1.1 x 10^-6 m^2
m/L = 7 x 10^-3 Kg/m
α = 17 x 10^-6
Y = 1.1 x 10^11 N/m^2
v = 46 m/s




We can write formula (1) such this:

v = √((Y.α.∆T.A)/(m/L))

and now substitute all the variables in the above formula for finding ∆T.
But now I don't know what do I have to do, ∆T2 to find the speed of the wave.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work out the initial tension in the wire. Then work out the tension after cooling 14 deg. Think of the wire shrinking due to the decrease in temperature but additional tension stretches it back to the original length.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top