B The sticky elactic in the Bloch sphere

naima
Gold Member
Messages
936
Reaction score
54
I found a funny model of the qubit written by Aerts in
Foundations of quantum physics: a general
realistic and operational realistic and operational approach.

At the beginning the qubit is at the point P on the Bloch sphere. It will be measured along another direction (two opposite points on the sphere). There is an elastic between these points. A and B. P falls orthogonally on AB at Q and then the elastic breaks somewhere between A and B. So Q is projected to up (A) or down (B) according to the probability formula of QM!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes; as far as the probabilities go, measurement is like a projection. This is true even for complicated measurements involving many qubits, though there's not a nice sphere-based visualization of those.

Here's a circuit diagram showing it happening. Notice how the probability of a wire being measured as On (+Z instead of -Z) closely tracks the vertical position on the Bloch sphere representation of the wire's state, and how the measured wire's state is pinned along the Z axis:

kINmB9c.gif
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top